Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 30, 2025

Speciation and Bioavailability Measurements of Environmental Plutonium Using Diffusion in Thin Films
Published on: November 9, 2015
Plutonium Systemic Biokinetic Model for Rats
John A Klumpp1, Deepesh Poudel1, Sara Dumit1
1Radiation Protection Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico.
Abstract:
A baseline compartmental model (relative to modeling decorporation) of the distribution and retention of plutonium (Pu) in the rat for a systemic intake is derived. The model is derived from data obtained from a study designed to evaluate the behavior of plutonium in the first 28 days after incorporation. The model is based on a recently published model of americium (Am) in rats, which incorporated a pharmacokinetic (PK)-front-end modeling approach, which was used to specify transfer to and from the extracellular fluids (ECF) in the various tissues in terms of vascular flow and volumes of ECF. In the americium model, the approach was "cell-membrane limited," meaning that rapid diffusion of americium occurred throughout all the extracellular fluids (i.e., the blood plasma and interstitial fluids), while back-end rates representing transport into and out of the cells were determined empirically. However, this approach was inconsistent with the plutonium dataset. A good fit to the data is obtained by incorporating aspects of the Durbin et al. model structure, with plutonium in plasma separated into "free" and "bound" components. Free plutonium uses a cell-membrane-limited front end as for americium. Bound plutonium uses a capillary-wall-limited front end, where transfer rates from blood plasma into the interstitial fluids are relatively slow, and must be determined either empirically or from a priori knowledge. As in the Durbin et al. model, both free and bound plutonium are available for deposition in bone. In addition, our model has some bound plutonium associated with uptake to the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Uncertainties in transfer rates were investigated using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC). It is anticipated that this model structure of plutonium will also be useful in interpreting comparable data from decorporation studies done in experimental animals.
More Related Videos
08:46Dose Uptake of Platinum- and Ruthenium-based Compound Exposure in Zebrafish by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry with Broader Applications
Published on: April 21, 2022
09:49A Whole Body Dosimetry Protocol for Peptide-Receptor Radionuclide Therapy PRRT: 2D Planar Image and Hybrid 2D+3D SPECT/CT Image Methods
Published on: April 24, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Incorporating Hepatic Transporter-Mediated Clearance
A recent model describes pravastatin's hepatobiliary excretion,...
Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Assumption with Protein Binding
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
Two-Compartment Open Model: IV Bolus Administration
The disparity between drug input and the sum of drug transfer rates between...
One-Compartment Open Model for IV Bolus Administration: Estimation of Elimination Rate Constant, Half-Life and Volume of Distribution
One-Compartment Open Model for IV Bolus Administration: General Considerations
The drug's presence in the body is defined by an equation representing the difference between the rates of drug entry and exit. Key parameters—elimination rate constant,...