Assessing Community-Based Public Health Plans: An Example From US Army Injury Prevention

The US Army requires community health coalitions to develop action plans for their top public health priorities.

To date, the US Army has not implemented a standardized review process for community action plans.

This project used the Plan Quality Index (PQI), an evidence-based, standardized tool, to evaluate injury prevention action plans created by injury prevention teams (IPTs).

17 Army installations.

17 IPT leads; 5 Health Promotion Program Officers.

Implementation of the PQI to evaluate the strength of injury prevention action plans and make recommendations for quality improvement to drive reductions in injuries at 17 Army installations.

PQI total scores for high- (≥50 points on the PQI) and low-ranking plans (<50 points on the PQI) were assessed for differences using t tests of the mean PQI score. Chi-square tests were employed to identify differences in meeting criteria between high- and low-scoring plans.

PQI total scores ranged from 9 to 78 points out of 80. The weakest planning elements among all plans were lack of use of SMART objectives (18%), lack of identification of responsible parties (18%), absent evaluation plan (24%), and lack of timelines (35%). The mean score for the high-ranking plans (64.6 ± 9.5) was significantly higher than the mean score for the low-ranking plans (26.2 ± 12.7) ( P < .001). Mean scores for clarity, effectiveness, and quality were all significantly higher for the high-ranking plans than for the low-ranking plans ( P = .014, P = .002, and P < .001, respectively).

The PQI tool provides a framework for objective, standardized, and evidence-based feedback and recommendations for improving community health plans. The project identified examples of high-quality action plans and provided actionable recommendations for plan improvement to facilitate sustainability of initiatives addressing injuries, which have long posed a threat to military health and readiness.