Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Medium-term outcomes of aortic valve-sparing procedure in trileaflet valve: Longitudinal analysis from the Heart Valve Society Registry.

JTCVS structural and endovascular·2026
Same author

Aortic homografts for native and prosthetic aortic valve and root endocarditis: Results from the EUropean REgistry of Cryopreserved Aortic Homografts EURECAH.

The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery·2026
Same author

Valve-sparing Aortic Root Replacement: Defining High-volume Centres Using Prospective Data.

European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery·2026
Same author

Outcomes of Aortic Valve Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Using Reconstructed Individual Patient Data.

Innovations (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2026
Same author

Aortic Growth After Isolated Aortic Valve Repair in Patients With Aortic Regurgitation Without Primary Aneurysm Indication.

European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery·2026
Same author

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Expert Consensus Pathway for Robotic Cardiac Surgical Training.

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2026
Same journal

Incidence of delirium in hospitalized heart failure patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine·2026
Same journal

Beyond metabolism and blood flow: toward an inflammation-metabolism axis paradigm for herbal medicine in obesity-related coronary heart disease.

Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine·2026
Same journal

Epicardial adipose tissue in cardiovascular diseases: a potential therapeutic target.

Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine·2026
Same journal

Isolated absent pulmonary valve syndrome with intact ventricular septum in a child with CHARGE syndrome: a rare case report and review of the literature.

Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine·2026
Same journal

Long-term follow-up of patients with pulmonary hypertension after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation and atrial tachycardia.

Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine·2026
Same journal

A case report of iatrogenic coronarocameral fistula after surgical aortic valve replacement: multimodality diagnosis and intravascular ultrasound-guided left main intervention.

Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 28, 2025

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Post-Stroke Upper Limb Rehabilitation with Robotic Technologies for Improved Motor Recovery and Functional Outcomes
04:49

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Post-Stroke Upper Limb Rehabilitation with Robotic Technologies for Improved Motor Recovery and Functional Outcomes

Published on: September 6, 2024

845

Robot-assisted vs. conventional MIDCAB: A propensity-matched analysis.

Jan Gofus1, Stepan Cerny1, Youssef Shahin1

  • 1Department of Cardiac Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Hradec Králové, Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czechia.

Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
|September 16, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Robotic assistance in minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting (RA-MIDCAB) shows reduced blood loss and faster recovery compared to conventional MIDCAB. Outcomes regarding complications and mortality remain similar between the two surgical approaches.

Keywords:
MIDCABcoronary artery bypass graftinginternal thoracic arteryminimally invasive surgeryrobotic surgery

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients Through Advanced Robotic and Neuromodulation Technologies
05:28

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients Through Advanced Robotic and Neuromodulation Technologies

Published on: October 11, 2024

674
Author Spotlight: Cutting-Edge Robotic Heller Myotomy Protocol for Treatment of Achalasia
09:46

Author Spotlight: Cutting-Edge Robotic Heller Myotomy Protocol for Treatment of Achalasia

Published on: February 16, 2024

787

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 28, 2025

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Post-Stroke Upper Limb Rehabilitation with Robotic Technologies for Improved Motor Recovery and Functional Outcomes
04:49

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Post-Stroke Upper Limb Rehabilitation with Robotic Technologies for Improved Motor Recovery and Functional Outcomes

Published on: September 6, 2024

845
Author Spotlight: Enhancing Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients Through Advanced Robotic and Neuromodulation Technologies
05:28

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients Through Advanced Robotic and Neuromodulation Technologies

Published on: October 11, 2024

674
Author Spotlight: Cutting-Edge Robotic Heller Myotomy Protocol for Treatment of Achalasia
09:46

Author Spotlight: Cutting-Edge Robotic Heller Myotomy Protocol for Treatment of Achalasia

Published on: February 16, 2024

787

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Robotic Surgery

Background:

  • Conventional minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB) and robotic assistance (RA-MIDCAB) offer distinct surgical approaches.
  • A direct comparison of these techniques, particularly regarding patient outcomes, is lacking in current literature.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the clinical outcomes of conventional MIDCAB versus RA-MIDCAB.
  • To evaluate the efficacy and safety of robotic assistance in internal thoracic artery harvesting for MIDCAB procedures.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing conventional MIDCAB (2005-2021) and RA-MIDCAB (2018-2021).
  • Propensity-score matching (PSM) using 27 preoperative covariates to create comparable patient groups.
  • Comparison of postoperative outcomes including blood loss, ventilation time, hospital stay, and perioperative complications.

Main Results:

  • One hundred and thirty matched pairs were analyzed after PSM, confirming the elimination of preoperative differences.
  • RA-MIDCAB patients experienced significantly lower 24-hour postoperative blood loss (300 vs. 450 ml, p=0.002).
  • Shorter artificial ventilation time (6 vs. 7 hours, p=0.018) and hospital stay (6 vs. 8 days, p<0.001) were observed in the RA-MIDCAB group.
  • No significant differences were found in perioperative complications, short-term, or mid-term mortality between the groups.

Conclusions:

  • Robotic assistance in MIDCAB (RA-MIDCAB) presents a viable alternative to conventional MIDCAB.
  • RA-MIDCAB is associated with reduced postoperative blood loss and potentially accelerated patient rehabilitation.
  • The safety profile, in terms of mortality and perioperative complications, is comparable between RA-MIDCAB and conventional MIDCAB.