Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 28, 2025

Intraoperative Assessment of Resection Margins in Oral Cavity Cancer: This is the Way
Published on: May 10, 2021
Meeting the New Commission on Cancer Operative Standards: Where Do We Stand Now?
Elizabeth L Carpenter1, Alexandra M Adams1, Patrick M McCarthy1
1Department of Surgery, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio TC, TX 78234, USA.
This study found initial low compliance with new rectal and lung cancer surgery standards but achieved 100% compliance after targeted interventions. Military facilities should review their practices for upcoming accreditation.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Surgical Oncology
- Accreditation Standards
Background:
- The Commission on Cancer (CoC) introduced new standards (5.7 and 5.8) for total mesorectal excision (TME) in rectal cancer and lymph node sampling in lung cancer.
- These standards are crucial for ensuring quality cancer care and patient outcomes.
- Compliance with these standards is mandatory for accredited cancer programs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate institutional adherence to CoC accreditation standards 5.7 and 5.8 for rectal and lung cancer resections.
- To identify compliance gaps and implement corrective actions.
- To offer recommendations for other military training facilities preparing for accreditation.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective chart review of 12 rectal and 48 lung cancer cases (2018-2020) was conducted.
- Deficiencies in operative and pathology reports were identified.
- Interventions were implemented, and compliance was reassessed.
Main Results:
- Pre-intervention compliance was 58% for rectal cancer (standard 5.7) and 35% for lung cancer (standard 5.8).
- Key deficits included inadequate synoptic reporting and lymph node sampling.
- Post-intervention, compliance reached 100% for both standards.
Conclusions:
- The institution successfully improved compliance with CoC standards through targeted interventions.
- Improvements in documentation and systematic lymph node sampling were critical.
- Military facilities should proactively assess their compliance with these standards to prepare for accreditation site visits.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Standards of Care II
Standards of Care I
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
Cancer Survival Analysis
Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
National Nursing Organizations II
The AACN emphasizes a healthy work environment through six standards to achieve an optimal patient outcome. The standards are appropriate staffing, meaningful recognition, collaboration, authentic leadership, effective communication, and decision-making. In addition, AACN provides certification programs, webinars, journals, and...

