Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 28, 2025

Application of Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation via Orbital Computed Tomography
Published on: November 30, 2022
Application value of a deep learning method based on a 3D V-Net convolutional neural network in the recognition and
Xing-Rui Wang1, Xi Ma1, Liu-Xu Jin1
1Xi'an Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Diseases, Xi'an No.3 Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Northwest University, Xi'an, China.
Objective:
To explore the feasibility of a deep learning three-dimensional (3D) V-Net convolutional neural network to construct high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT)-based auditory ossicle structure recognition and segmentation models.
Methods:
The temporal bone HRCT images of 158 patients were collected retrospectively, and the malleus, incus, and stapes were manually segmented. The 3D V-Net and U-Net convolutional neural networks were selected as the deep learning methods for segmenting the auditory ossicles. The temporal bone images were randomized into a training set (126 cases), a test set (16 cases), and a validation set (16 cases). Taking the results of manual segmentation as a control, the segmentation results of each model were compared.
Results:
The Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) of the malleus, incus, and stapes, which were automatically segmented with a 3D V-Net convolutional neural network and manually segmented from the HRCT images, were 0.920 ± 0.014, 0.925 ± 0.014, and 0.835 ± 0.035, respectively. The average surface distance (ASD) was 0.257 ± 0.054, 0.236 ± 0.047, and 0.258 ± 0.077, respectively. The Hausdorff distance (HD) 95 was 1.016 ± 0.080, 1.000 ± 0.000, and 1.027 ± 0.102, respectively. The DSCs of the malleus, incus, and stapes, which were automatically segmented using the 3D U-Net convolutional neural network and manually segmented from the HRCT images, were 0.876 ± 0.025, 0.889 ± 0.023, and 0.758 ± 0.044, respectively. The ASD was 0.439 ± 0.208, 0.361 ± 0.077, and 0.433 ± 0.108, respectively. The HD 95 was 1.361 ± 0.872, 1.174 ± 0.350, and 1.455 ± 0.618, respectively. As these results demonstrated, there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.001).
Conclusion:
The 3D V-Net convolutional neural network yielded automatic recognition and segmentation of the auditory ossicles and produced similar accuracy to manual segmentation results.
Related Concept Videos
The Auditory Ossicles
The aptly named stapes look very much like a stirrup. The three ossicles are unique to mammals, and each plays a role in...
Classification of Bones
Long and Short Bones
The appendicular skeleton, particularly the upper and lower limbs, is primarily made of long and short bones. The...
Anatomy of the Ear
Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by...

