Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The Brophy case: whose life is it?

H R Beresford

    Neurology
    |August 1, 1987
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    A Massachusetts court allowed nutrition withdrawal for a permanently unconscious patient based on their prior wishes. The ruling emphasized patient autonomy over quality-of-life judgments by others, preventing misuse for vulnerable individuals.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    American Academy of Neurology qualifications and guidelines for the physician expert witness.

    Neurology·2006
    Same author

    The Webster's dictionary: neurologists on the Internet.

    Neurology·1999
    Same author

    Brain death.

    Neurologic clinics·1999
    Same author

    The persistent vegetative state: a view across the legal divide.

    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·1998
    Same author

    Medicolegal aspects of neurodiagnostic tests.

    Neurologic clinics·1996
    Same author

    Containing partisan medical experts.

    Journal of child neurology·1995
    Same journal

    Phenotype, Severity, and Therapy of Patients With LRP4 Antibody-Associated Myasthenia Gravis in the German Myasthenia Gravis Registry.

    Neurology·2026
    Same journal

    Association of Changes in Intrinsic Capacity With Cognitive Decline and Dementia: A Prospective Cohort Study.

    Neurology·2026
    Same journal

    Role of the Upper Motor Neuron in the Generation of Fasciculations in Early Disease Stages of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

    Neurology·2026
    Same journal

    Factors Associated With Disability Improvement and Worsening Independent of Attacks in Patients With AQP4-IgG+ NMOSD and MOGAD: A Multicenter Cohort Study.

    Neurology·2026
    Same journal

    Cost-Effectiveness of Intracranial Aneurysm Screening: A Systematic Review.

    Neurology·2026
    Same journal

    Rare Eating Epilepsy: Co-Occurrence of Focal Cortical Dysplasia and Gray Matter Heterotopia.

    Neurology·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Ethics
    • Legal Medicine
    • Bioethics

    Background:

    • Court cases involving end-of-life decisions for incapacitated patients are complex.
    • Patient autonomy and advance directives are central to medical ethics.
    • Determining the legal and ethical basis for withdrawing life support is crucial.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To analyze a recent Massachusetts court ruling on nutrition withdrawal for a chronically vegetative patient.
    • To examine the court's reasoning regarding patient autonomy versus external quality-of-life assessments.
    • To clarify the implications of the ruling for end-of-life care and legal precedent.

    Main Methods:

    • Case law analysis of a specific Massachusetts court decision.
    • Review of legal arguments concerning patient directives and substituted judgment.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Ethical analysis of quality-of-life considerations in end-of-life decision-making.

    • Main Results:

    • The court authorized the withdrawal of nutrition from an adult in a chronic vegetative state.
    • The decision was based on the patient's previously expressed wishes while competent.
    • The court explicitly rejected quality-of-life determinations by third parties as grounds for withdrawal.

    Conclusions:

    • This ruling reinforces the principle of patient autonomy in end-of-life care.
    • It establishes a precedent for respecting advance directives in cases of permanent unconsciousness.
    • The decision aims to prevent the misuse of withdrawal of care for vulnerable populations based on others' judgments.