Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Potential Due to a Magnetized Object01:24

Potential Due to a Magnetized Object

344
Magnetic dipoles in magnetic materials are aligned when placed under an external magnetic field. For paramagnets and ferromagnets, dipole alignment occurs in the direction of the magnetic field. However, the dipoles align opposite to the field in the case of diamagnets. This state of magnetic polarization due to the external field is called magnetization. Magnetization is defined as the dipole moment per unit volume. It plays a similar role to polarization in electrostatics.
The vector...
344
Magnetism01:30

Magnetism

6.5K
Magnets are commonly found in everyday objects, such as toys, hangers, elevators, doorbells, and computer devices. Experimentation on these magnets shows that all magnets have two poles: one is labeled north (N) and the other south (S). Magnetic poles repel if they are alike and attract if unlike. Moreover, both poles of a magnet attract unmagnetized pieces of iron.
An individual magnetic pole cannot be isolated. No matter how small, every piece of a magnet contains a north pole and a south...
6.5K
Magnetic Force On Current-Carrying Wires: Example01:22

Magnetic Force On Current-Carrying Wires: Example

1.6K
In a magnetic field, moving charges encounter a force. If a wire contains these moving charges, i.e., if the wire is carrying a current, then a force acts on the wire as well. Consider a pair of flexible leads holding a wire that is 40 cm long and 10 g in weight in a horizontal position. The wire is placed in a constant magnetic field of 0.40 T, as shown in Figure 1(a). Determine the magnitude and direction of the current flowing in the wire needed to remove the tension in the supporting leads.
1.6K
Magnetic Resonance Imaging01:24

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

5.6K
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a noninvasive medical imaging technique based on a phenomenon of nuclear physics discovered in the 1930s, in which matter exposed to magnetic fields and radio waves was found to emit radio signals. In 1970, a physician and researcher named Raymond Damadian noticed that malignant (cancerous) tissue gave off different signals than normal body tissue. He applied for a patent for the first MRI scanning device in clinical use by the early 1980s. The early MRI...
5.6K
Eddy Currents01:25

Eddy Currents

1.7K
Since eddy currents occur only in conductors, magnets can separate metals from other materials. For example, in a recycling center, trash is dumped in batches down a ramp, beneath which lies a powerful magnet. Conductors in the trash are slowed by eddy currents, while nonmetals in the trash move on, separating from the metals. This works for all metals, not just ferromagnetic ones.
Other major applications of eddy currents appear in metal detectors and the braking systems of trains and roller...
1.7K
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI01:14

Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI

412
Introduction: MRI and CT scans are crucial advancements in medical imaging techniques, playing a vital role in diagnosing conditions related to the gastrointestinal (GI) system. Each scan serves distinct purposes, targets specific areas, and requires unique nursing duties.
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
412

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Strengthening Advocacy Through Clinician Partnerships with Government Relations and Other Policy Experts: Recent Advances.

Academic pediatrics·2026
Same author

Progression of MASH to cirrhosis, decompensation, and mortality, and the utility of NITs for detection and risk stratification.

Hepatology communications·2026
Same author

Demographic Shifts in Pediatric Emergency Department Visits for Homelessness During State and Federal Policy Changes.

The Journal of pediatrics·2026
Same author

Institutional Variation in Cervical Spine Imaging among Children with Blunt Trauma: A Multicenter Prospective Observational Cohort Study.

The Journal of pediatrics·2026
Same author

Directly comparing randomized and real-world controls in adjuvant breast cancer.

Journal of comparative effectiveness research·2026
Same author

Development of a Keyword-Based Search Strategy to Identify Gender Diverse Youth in Electronic Medical Records.

Transgender health·2026
Same journal

Video vs Telephone Consultations for Pediatric Quality of Care in Emergency Departments.

Pediatrics·2026
Same journal

A Resource to Understand and Prevent Sudden Unexpected Infant Deaths.

Pediatrics·2026
Same journal

Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Against Pediatric Death in the United States: 2016-2025.

Pediatrics·2026
Same journal

Averting the Unthinkable: Immunization to Prevent Childhood Deaths From Influenza.

Pediatrics·2026
Same journal

Severe Postoperative Hypernatremia in an Adolescent Following Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Pediatrics·2026
Same journal

Barriers to Implementing SMART for Asthma in Pediatric Primary Care.

Pediatrics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 26, 2025

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis at 7.0 Tesla
08:51

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis at 7.0 Tesla

Published on: February 19, 2021

9.1K

Warning Labels and High-Powered Magnet Exposures.

Leah K Middelberg1, Julie C Leonard1, Junxin Shi1

  • 1Department of Pediatrics, Division of Emergency Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio.

Pediatrics
|October 3, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Warning labels on high-powered magnets are ineffective, as most parents and children are unaware of their presence or fail to read them. These magnets pose significant risks and are often mistaken for children

More Related Videos

Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Skeletal Muscle Disease
09:30

Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Skeletal Muscle Disease

Published on: December 18, 2016

19.6K
In Vitro and In Vivo Delivery of Magnetic Nanoparticle Hyperthermia Using a Custom-Built Delivery System
06:45

In Vitro and In Vivo Delivery of Magnetic Nanoparticle Hyperthermia Using a Custom-Built Delivery System

Published on: July 2, 2020

4.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 26, 2025

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis at 7.0 Tesla
08:51

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis at 7.0 Tesla

Published on: February 19, 2021

9.1K
Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Skeletal Muscle Disease
09:30

Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Skeletal Muscle Disease

Published on: December 18, 2016

19.6K
In Vitro and In Vivo Delivery of Magnetic Nanoparticle Hyperthermia Using a Custom-Built Delivery System
06:45

In Vitro and In Vivo Delivery of Magnetic Nanoparticle Hyperthermia Using a Custom-Built Delivery System

Published on: July 2, 2020

4.4K

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Safety
  • Consumer Product Risk Assessment

Background:

  • High-powered magnets are a significant danger to children, often ingested or inserted into body cavities.
  • Calls for bans exist, but manufacturers propose warning labels as a sufficient risk mitigation strategy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of warning labels on high-powered magnet products in preventing childhood injuries.
  • To assess parental and patient awareness and attitudes regarding high-powered magnet risks.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective, multicenter study (IMPACT of Magnets) involving children with high-powered magnet exposures.
  • Consenting participants completed a questionnaire on warning label presence, utility, manufacturer, and risk perception.

Main Results:

  • Of 174 participants, 53.6% did not know if warning labels were present, and 22.3% stated they were absent.
  • Only 46.4% of those with labels present reported reading them.
  • Nearly half of subjects believed high-powered magnets were children's toys, despite 58% knowing they were dangerous.

Conclusions:

  • Warning labels are unlikely to prevent injuries due to low awareness and readership.
  • The perceived nature of high-powered magnets as toys exacerbates the risk.
  • Current warning label strategies are insufficient for mitigating the dangers of these products to children.