Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 26, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
Published on: October 11, 2018
Bounds on mutual information of mixture data for classification tasks
Abstract:
To quantify the optimum performance for classification tasks, the Shannon mutual information is a natural information-theoretic metric, as it is directly related to the probability of error. The data produced by many imaging systems can be modeled by mixture distributions. The mutual information between mixture data and the class label does not have an analytical expression nor any efficient computational algorithms. We introduce a variational upper bound, a lower bound, and three approximations, all employing pair-wise divergences between mixture components. We compare the new bounds and approximations with Monte Carlo stochastic sampling and bounds derived from entropy bounds. To conclude, we evaluate the performance of the bounds and approximations through numerical simulations.
Related Concept Videos
Aggregates Classification
Petrographic classification groups aggregates based on common mineralogical characteristics. Some of the common mineral groups found in aggregates are...
Classification of Systems-I
Homogeneity dictates that if an input x(t) is multiplied by a constant c, the output y(t) is multiplied by the same constant. Mathematically, this is expressed as:
Classification of Systems-II
Classification of Signals
A continuous-time signal holds a value at every instant in time, representing information seamlessly. In contrast, a discrete-time signal holds values only at specific moments, often denoted as x(n), where...
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.

