Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 25, 2025

Finite Element Modeling for the Simulation of the Quasi-Static Compression of Corrugated Tapered Tubes
Published on: January 6, 2023
Prediction of Axial Capacity of Concrete Filled Steel Tubes Using Gene Expression Programming
Kaffayatullah Khan1, Mudassir Iqbal2, Muhammad Raheel3
1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia.
This study models the ultimate compressive strength of concrete-filled hollow steel sections using gene expression programming. The optimal model accurately predicts performance, showing strength increases with diameter, thickness, and yield strength.
Area of Science:
- Structural Engineering
- Materials Science
- Computational Mechanics
Background:
- Infrastructure project safety and economy rely on accurate material simulation and design.
- Concrete-filled hollow steel sections (CFSS) offer composite action for axially loaded members.
- Existing models may not fully capture the complex behavior of CFSS.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a mathematical expression for the ultimate compressive strength (P_u) of CFSS using gene expression programming (GEP).
- To identify key input parameters influencing CFSS performance.
- To validate the developed GEP model against experimental data.
Main Methods:
- Utilized 149 data points from literature for CFSS ultimate compressive strength.
- Incorporated ten input parameters: D, wall thickness, f_c', E_c, f_y, E_s, L, ζ, D/t ratio, and L/D ratio.
- Employed GEP to formulate predictive mathematical expressions for P_u.
Main Results:
- The optimal GEP Model T3 (N_c=100, H_s=8, N_g=3) demonstrated high accuracy.
- Model T3 achieved an overall R-squared of 0.99, with low RMSE and MAE values in training and testing phases.
- Regression slope analysis confirmed Model T3's superior performance (R=0.99).
Conclusions:
- GEP provides a robust method for modeling CFSS ultimate compressive strength.
- Model T3 offers a reliable predictive tool for structural engineers.
- Parametric analysis indicates P_u increases linearly with outer diameter (D), wall thickness (t), and steel yield strength (f_y).
Related Concept Videos
Normal Strain under Axial Loading
Dynamic Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete
The sonic test is a common method to determine the dynamic modulus. In this test, a concrete beam, sized either 6 x 6 x 30 inches or 4 x 4 x 20 inches, is clamped at its center. Vibrations are initiated at one end of the beam by an electromagnetic exciter unit powered by...
General Case of Eccentric Axial Loading
Consider a member subjected to equal and opposite forces that are applied along a line that does not coincide with the member's neutral axis. In unsymmetrical...
Tensile Strength Considerations of Concrete
The dimensions and shape of a concrete specimen...
Stresses under Combined Loadings
The process begins by slicing the tube at critical points and analyzing the internal forces and stress components at these sections, focusing on the centroid. Normal stresses, generated by axial forces and bending moments, are either compressive or tensile and vary across the section from...
Behavior of Concrete Under Compressive Load
As the concrete specimen fractures under...

