Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 25, 2025

Comprehensive & Cost Effective Laboratory Monitoring of HIV/AIDS: an African Role Model
Published on: October 31, 2010
Improving indicator-condition guided testing for HIV in the hospital setting (PROTEST 2·0): A multicenter,
Saskia J Bogers1,2,3, Maarten F Schim van der Loeff1,2,4, Anders Boyd2,4,5
1Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Internal Medicine, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Indicator-condition guided HIV testing increased significantly after an intervention, identifying more undiagnosed people living with HIV (PLHIV). However, improvements varied across different conditions, highlighting the need for tailored strategies.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Infectious Diseases
- Clinical Medicine
Background:
- Indicator-condition (IC) guided HIV testing is a cost-effective strategy to find undiagnosed people living with HIV (PLHIV).
- Implementation of IC-guided HIV testing remains suboptimal.
- This study aimed to enhance IC-guided HIV testing across seven specific indicator conditions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention designed to promote IC-guided HIV testing.
- To assess the impact of the intervention on HIV testing rates within a specific timeframe around IC diagnosis.
- To identify variations in intervention effectiveness across different indicator conditions.
Main Methods:
- A quasi-experimental study was conducted in five Amsterdam region hospitals.
- Electronic health records were used to assess HIV testing rates in adult patients with an IC before and after the intervention.
- The intervention involved audit and feedback, and data were analyzed using segmented Poisson regression.
Main Results:
- The proportion of patients tested for HIV within three months of IC diagnosis increased from 36.8% to 47.0% (adjusted RR=1.16).
- Significant increases in HIV testing were observed for cervical cancer and peripheral neuropathy.
- A total of 18 HIV-positive cases were identified (0.6% of tested patients).
Conclusions:
- The intervention successfully improved overall IC-guided HIV testing rates.
- The effectiveness of the intervention varied across different indicator conditions.
- Further research is needed to understand and address the variations in intervention impact.
More Related Videos
19:57An Affordable HIV-1 Drug Resistance Monitoring Method for Resource Limited Settings
Published on: March 30, 2014
13:58Amplifying and Quantifying HIV-1 RNA in HIV Infected Individuals with Viral Loads Below the Limit of Detection by Standard Clinical Assays
Published on: September 26, 2011