Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 25, 2025

Non-fluoroscopic Catheter Tracking for Fluoroscopy Reduction in Interventional Electrophysiology
Published on: May 26, 2015
Effect of concomitant Renal DeNervation and cardiac ablation on Atrial Fibrillation recurrence - RDN+AF study
Bettina Kirstein1,2, Jakub Tomala2, Julia Mayer2
1Department of Rhythmology, University Heart Center Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.
Renal denervation combined with atrial fibrillation ablation did not improve rhythm outcomes or blood pressure control in patients with resistant hypertension. This study found no significant benefit over ablation alone for managing these complex cardiovascular conditions.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Hypertension Management
Background:
- Arterial hypertension (aHT) contributes to cardiac sympathetic activity, which may influence cardiac arrhythmias.
- The antiarrhythmic effects of renal denervation (RDN) in patients with drug-resistant aHT undergoing atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation are not well understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of concomitant renal denervation (RDN) and catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with uncontrolled, multi-drug resistant arterial hypertension (aHT).
- To assess the impact of RDN+AF ablation on rhythm outcomes, blood pressure control, and safety compared to AF ablation alone.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, randomized, two-center trial (RDN+AF study) enrolled patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF and uncontrolled aHT despite ≥3 antihypertensive drugs.
- Patients were randomized 1:2 to either RDN+AF ablation or AF-only ablation.
- The primary endpoint was freedom from AF episodes >2 min at 12 months, assessed by implantable loop recorder or 7-day Holter ECG.
Main Results:
- 61 patients were randomized. At 12 months, RDN+AF showed a trend towards greater BP reduction, but it was not statistically significant.
- No significant differences in rhythm outcomes were observed between groups at 12 or 24 months (12 months: 61% vs 53%, p=0.622; 24 months: 39% vs 47%, p=0.927).
- Periprocedural complications occurred in 15% of patients; no deaths were reported.
Conclusions:
- Concomitant RDN+AF ablation did not demonstrate superior blood pressure control or rhythm outcomes compared to AF-only ablation in patients with resistant aHT and AF.
- The findings suggest that current RDN strategies may not offer additional antiarrhythmic or antihypertensive benefits in this specific patient population.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Antihypertensive Drugs: Direct Renin Inhibitors
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class II Agents as β-Adrenergic Blockers
Heart Failure V: Medical Management

