Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 22, 2025

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
Published on: July 24, 2016
Balancing multiple stakeholder objectives for floodplain reconnection and wetland restoration
Lindsay C Worley1, Kristen L Underwood1, Rebecca M Diehl2
1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Votey Building, 33 Colchester Ave., University of Vermont, Burlington VT, 05405, USA.
Floodplain restoration projects offer nutrient storage and habitat benefits. A new decision tool helps planners rank scenarios, balancing flood resilience and water quality goals for optimal outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Hydrology
- Ecological Restoration
Background:
- Floodplain reconnection and wetland restoration are key nature-based solutions for enhancing flood resilience.
- These projects offer co-benefits like nutrient storage and improved habitats.
- Stakeholder objectives for riverside land use can be complex and sometimes conflicting.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and illustrate a decision-support tool for simulating floodplain restoration scenarios.
- To quantify and assess trade-offs between multiple stakeholder objectives in restoration design.
- To enable planners to identify optimal restoration designs that balance competing goals.
Main Methods:
- A simple ranking approach using an n-dimensional objective function was developed.
- The approach was applied to a watershed in central Vermont, USA.
- Eleven restoration modifications were simulated using the 2D Hydrologic Engineering Center's River Analysis System (2D HEC-RAS) across six scenarios, plus a baseline.
Main Results:
- Floodplain restoration scenarios showed modest peak flow attenuation due to the watershed's steep and flashy nature.
- Several scenarios successfully met or exceeded annual phosphorus load reduction targets for Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) implementation.
- The ranking approach effectively prioritized scenarios based on multiple stakeholder objectives.
Conclusions:
- The decision-support tool aids planners in evaluating and visualizing the effectiveness of different restoration designs.
- The approach facilitates consensus-building among stakeholders by quantifying trade-offs and justifying design choices.
- While peak flow reduction was limited, floodplain restoration proved effective for nutrient management in this watershed.
Related Concept Videos
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Conservation of Mass in Moving, Nondeforming Control Volume
In the context of a detention basin, the conservation of mass states that the total mass of water entering the basin must equal the mass leaving the basin plus any accumulation of...
Design Example: Maintaining Level of an Embankment
Responses to Drought and Flooding
Typical Model Studies
Bioremediation

