Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 22, 2025

Mouse Model of Surgical Uterine Injury and Subsequent Pregnancy Outcomes
Published on: June 27, 2025
A Review and Comparison of the Efficacy of Prophylactic Interventional Radiological Arterial Occlusions in Placenta
Benyamin Alam1, Faizan Nasir1, Amir Reza Akbari2
1Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, WM, United Kingdom.
Insights
Prophylactic arterial occlusion using interventional radiology significantly reduces blood loss and hysterectomy rates in placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders. Abdominal aorta (AA) or uterine artery (UA) occlusion is more effective than internal iliac artery (IIA) occlusion.
Area of Science:
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Interventional Radiology
- Maternal-Fetal Medicine
Background:
- Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders are rising, posing risks of severe hemorrhage, maternal, and neonatal morbidity.
- Current prophylactic strategies involve interventional radiology (IR) arterial occlusion (internal iliac artery [IIA], abdominal aorta [AA], or uterine artery [UA]).
Approach:
- A meta-analysis was conducted on 16 case-control studies evaluating IR arterial occlusion in PAS patients.
- Studies were analyzed to compare the effectiveness of IIA, AA, and UA occlusion in reducing estimated blood loss (EBL) and hysterectomy rates.
Key Points:
- Prophylactic IR arterial occlusion significantly reduces both EBL and hysterectomy rates in PAS patients.
- Internal iliac artery (IIA) occlusion demonstrated no significant effect on EBL and minimal reduction in hysterectomies.
- Abdominal aorta (AA) and uterine artery (UA) occlusion provided the most significant reductions in both EBL and hysterectomies.
Conclusions:
- Prophylactic IR arterial occlusion is recommended for PAS patients to decrease EBL and hysterectomy rates.
- Findings suggest favoring AA or UA occlusion over IIA occlusion for improved outcomes in PAS management.
Rationale And Objectives:
Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders are increasingly common and associated with significant maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality due to the associated risk of massive haemorrhage. Currently prophylactic interventional radiology (IR) arterial occlusion is being performed occluding either the internal iliac artery (IIA), abdominal aorta (AA) or uterine artery (UA) in order to prevent this blood loss. The aim of this meta-analysis is to identify whether these IR procedures are effective in reducing estimated blood loss (EBL) and hysterectomy rates and if so which method achieves the optimal results METHODS: A literature search was conducted to acquire case-control studies assessing EBL and hysterectomies performed following IR arterial occlusion in PAS patients, yielding 16 results. Studies were analyzed together and later split into groups dependent on the artery occluded. The results of these were then inputted into forest plots to identify their overall estimated effect with confidence intervals.
Results:
Prophylactic IR arterial occlusion was proven to reduce both EBL and hysterectomies. When separated by artery, IIA achieved the worst outcomes with no proven effect on EBL and a minimal reduction in hysterectomies. UA scored in the middle with a modest reduction in both outcomes, whilst AA occlusion had the most significant reduction in both EBL and hysterectomies.
Conclusion:
Prophylactic IR arterial occlusion should be routinely considered in PAS patients to reduce both EBL and rates of hysterectomies. Current literature promotes the use of IIA occlusion; however the findings of this analysis propose that AA and UA occlusion should be favoured.
More Related Videos
09:52Accurate and Simple Evaluation of Vascular Anastomoses in Monochorionic Placenta using Colored Dye
Published on: September 5, 2011
09:04Comprehensive Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Safety of Placenta-Targeted Drug Delivery Using Three Complementary Methods
Published on: September 10, 2018