Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2025

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
Goals, usefulness and abstraction in value-based choice.
Benedetto De Martino1, Aurelio Cortese1
1Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London WC1N 3AZ, UK; Computational Neuroscience Laboratories, ATR Institute International, 619-0288 Kyoto, Japan.
Value in decision-making shifts with changing goals. This study explores how the brain computes usefulness by creating flexible abstractions, integrating artificial intelligence and cognitive neuroscience.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Neuroeconomics
- Artificial Intelligence
Background:
- Decision-making research often equates value with reward, focusing on hedonic aspects.
- The functional, concept-like nature of value computation has been overlooked.
- Real-life scenarios demonstrate the need for flexible value reassessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To outline computational and biological principles of adaptive value computation.
- To explain how the brain creates abstractions for flexible goal adaptation.
- To compare algorithmic architectures from AI and cognitive neuroscience.
Main Methods:
- Reviewing computational and biological principles of value.
- Presenting algorithmic architectures from AI and cognitive neuroscience.
- Comparing these with psychological theories.
Main Results:
- The brain computes usefulness through abstractions that adapt to changing goals.
- Different algorithmic architectures can model this adaptive value computation.
- Parallels are drawn between AI, neuroscience, and psychological theories.
Conclusions:
- Value computation is not solely reward-based but involves flexible, goal-dependent abstractions.
- Understanding these principles can bridge artificial intelligence and cognitive neuroscience.
- Adaptive value computation is crucial for navigating dynamic environments.
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Framing Effects
Ethics and Bioethics
Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable...

