Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2025

09:03
Semiconductor Sequencing for Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy
Published on: August 25, 2019
9.5K
Atypicality index: avoiding false reassurance in prenatal screening
S E Kristensen1,2, K Gadsbøll1,2, K H Nicolaides3
1Center for Fetal Medicine, Pregnancy and Ultrasound, Department of Obstetrics, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Summary
The atypicality index enhances first-trimester screening for major trisomies by identifying pregnancies with adverse outcomes. Even in low-risk cases, a highly atypical profile significantly increases the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Prenatal diagnostics
- Maternal-fetal medicine
Background:
- First-trimester screening is crucial for assessing major trisomies.
- The combined test integrates maternal serum markers and ultrasound measurements.
- An atypicality index quantifies deviations from typical measurement profiles.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the atypicality index as an adjunct to first-trimester combined screening for major trisomies.
- To assess the association between atypicality index and adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A study of 123,998 Danish women with singleton pregnancies.
- Calculation of an atypicality index for nuchal translucency, free β-hCG, and PAPP-A.
- Tabulation of adverse pregnancy outcomes based on screening results and atypicality index.
Main Results:
- Adverse pregnancy outcome incidence increased with higher atypicality index in both low- and high-risk groups.
- In low-risk pregnancies, an atypicality index ≥99% showed a 5.1-fold higher adverse outcome rate compared to <80%.
- In high-risk pregnancies, an atypicality index ≥99% showed a 7.9-fold higher adverse outcome rate compared to <80%.
Conclusions:
- Atypicality index profiles in low-risk pregnancies can provide additional reassurance or indicate further investigation.
- The atypicality index offers a transparent and intuitive visualization of multiple screening variables.
- This method aids in interpreting combined measurements and atypicality levels for improved risk assessment.
Related Concept Videos
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
598
In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...
Sensitivity is the...
598
Nondisjunction
3.9K
Nondisjunction is the failure of homologous chromosomes or sister chromatids to separate correctly and move to the opposite poles of the cells. This produces daughter cells with abnormal chromosome numbers. Nondisjunction is common during anaphase I or anaphase II of meiosis. Mutations in synaptonemal complex proteins that attach homologous chromosomes increase the chances of nondisjunction in anaphase I of meiosis I. In contrast, mutations in topoisomerases and condensins that hold...
3.9K
Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot
310
A ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) plot is a graphical tool used to assess the performance of a binary classification model by illustrating the trade-off between sensitivity (true positive rate) and specificity (false positive rate). By plotting sensitivity against 1 - specificity across various threshold settings, the ROC curve shows how well the model distinguishes between classes, with a curve closer to the top-left corner indicating a more accurate model. The area under the ROC curve...
310

