Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2025
3D Printing Model of a Patient's Specific Lumbar Vertebra
Published on: April 14, 2023
Three-Dimensional Printing Model Enhances Correct Identification and Understanding of Pelvic Fracture in Medical
Mingming Yan1, Jun Huang2, Muliang Ding1
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, PR China.
Objective:
Understanding the anatomy behind a pelvic fracture can be a significant challenge to medical students. Recent advances in three-dimensional printing technology offers a novel approach to facilitate the learning of complex fracture. We have described here how the 3-dimension printing (3Dp) models can help medical students improve their understanding in and identification of pelvic fractures.
Design:
One hundred students were randomized into 2 teaching module groups (with or without 3Dp models). Prior to randomization assignment, a 50-minute didactic lecture covering elementary knowledge of anatomy, Young-Burgess classification, and traumatic mechanism of pelvic fracture was delivered to all students. The 3Dp group received X-rays, CT images, and 3Dp models of the eight pelvic fractures during presentation, while the students in the control group only obtained X-rays and CT scans of the same 8 pelvic fractures. Young-Burgess classification system and injury mechanism of pelvic fracture, time for evaluation, and subjective questions were conducted to assess the learning outcomes.
Setting:
A medical student program based in a LevelⅠtrauma center PARTICIPANTS: One hundred students in their 4th year of a 5-year clinical medicine program (for a medical bachelor degree) RESULTS: Students receiving 3Dp model had a higher rate of identifying the correct pelvic fracture via Young-Burgess identification compared to these without 3Dp model. Moreover, the accuracy of identifying the injury mechanism was significantly higher in the 3Dp group than that in group without 3Dp model. Participant in 3Dp group had faster assessment time compared to the control group. Subjective survey results suggested that 3Dp model would increase the learning interest and enhance the understanding of pelvic fracture. In addition, majority of students (83%) reported that they would like to use 3Dp model in other surgical course education.
Conclusions:
3Dp model increased the perceived accuracy of pelvic fracture identification and understanding of injury mechanism. Moreover, 3Dp model promoted the subjective interest and motivation of students in pelvic fracture learning. Therefore, 3Dp model can be considered as a valuable educational tool for learning pelvic fracture in medical students.
