Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

5.6K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
5.6K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

3.5K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
3.5K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

4.3K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
4.3K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

260
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
260
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

3.4K
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
3.4K
The Bell Curve01:21

The Bell Curve

314
The normal probability distribution, often depicted as a symmetrical, bell-shaped curve, is fundamental in statistics and the study of natural phenomena. This pattern, famously described by mathematician Carl Friedrich Gauss, shows how data points are distributed around a central mean, with most values near the average and fewer observations occurring as they deviate further from it.
This pattern applies to many human characteristics beyond intelligence, such as height. For example, if you...
314

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Do We Look Like Our Siblings' Names? A Socio-Onomastic Perspective on the Face-Name Matching Effect.

International review of social psychology·2026
Same author

Taxonomic and thematic generalization of safety behaviors.

Behaviour research and therapy·2025
Same author

Measuring the semantic priming effect across many languages.

Nature human behaviour·2025
Same author

Crowdsourcing multiverse analyses to explore the impact of different data-processing and analysis decisions: A tutorial.

Psychological methods·2025
Same author

The Replication Database: Documenting the Replicability of Psychological Science.

Journal of open psychology data·2025
Same author

Beyond dichotomies in generalization research: A reply to Lee and Schlegelmilch (2025).

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 18, 2025

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

11.7K

Taking a Closer Look at the Bayesian Truth Serum.

Philipp Schoenegger1, Steven Verheyen2

  • 1University of St Andrews, School of Economics & Finance; School of Philosophical, Anthropological and Film Studies, St Andrews, UK.

Experimental Psychology
|December 8, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Researchers investigated the Bayesian Truth Serum (BTS) for incentivizing honest survey responses. The study found no significant difference in behavior between BTS and standard payment, suggesting the mechanism may not alter responses as hypothesized.

Keywords:
Bayesian Truth Serumbonusincentivizationmethodsrewards

More Related Videos

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.2K
Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
11:51

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making

Published on: March 2, 2011

15.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 18, 2025

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

11.7K
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.2K
Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
11:51

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making

Published on: March 2, 2011

15.2K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Behavioral Economics
  • Experimental Philosophy

Background:

  • Psychology and related fields are undergoing scientific reform, including statistical methods and academic norms.
  • Participant incentivization in experimental design, particularly in psychology and experimental philosophy, has received limited attention.
  • Current incentive structures often conflict with honest preference reporting, especially with self-report data from online platforms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To directly replicate previous findings on the Bayesian Truth Serum (BTS) in Likert-scale self-reports.
  • To analyze if the BTS's effect is distinct from its components: increased earnings and prediction tasks.
  • To assess the utility of BTS for improving data quality in subjective self-report studies.

Main Methods:

  • A registered report design was employed to investigate the Bayesian Truth Serum (BTS).
  • Participants were divided into groups receiving standard payment versus BTS incentivization.
  • Response behavior was analyzed to compare the effects of BTS against its constituent parts (earnings, prediction tasks).

Main Results:

  • No significant differences in response behavior were found between participants incentivized with BTS and those receiving standard payment.
  • The study failed to replicate previous findings suggesting the BTS significantly alters response behavior.
  • Weak evidence suggests the prediction task component of BTS may influence response distributions independently of earnings.

Conclusions:

  • The current study provides evidence for a null effect of the Bayesian Truth Serum on Likert-scale responses.
  • Replication of previous findings was not successful, warranting caution in adopting BTS for subjective data collection.
  • Further research is needed to explore potential smaller effect sizes and variations across different item types and participant pools.