Related Experiment Videos
[Amikacin and gentamicin: a controlled comparison (author's transl)]
Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)
|December 29, 1978
Summary
Amikacin demonstrated a higher success rate than gentamicin in treating gram-negative urinary tract infections. This antibiotic showed a statistically significant advantage in eradicating bacteria.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacology
- Infectious Diseases
- Nephrology
Background:
- Gram-negative bacteria are common causes of urinary tract infections (UTIs).
- Antibiotic resistance to penicillin and cephalosporin necessitates alternative treatments.
- Aminoglycosides like amikacin and gentamicin are used for severe UTIs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of amikacin versus gentamicin in treating UTIs.
- To evaluate the impact of renal function on aminoglycoside dosing.
- To assess bacteriological eradication and clinical outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A randomized, double-blind study involving 50 patients (25 per group).
- Patients received amikacin (375 mg/d) or gentamicin (240 mg/d) intramuscularly.
- Dosing was adjusted for impaired renal function.
- Treatment success was based on urine culture results (bacteriological eradication) and white blood cell counts at 3 and 10 days post-treatment.
Main Results:
- Amikacin showed a higher overall success rate compared to gentamicin across various criteria.
- Bacteriological eradication, the primary endpoint, was statistically significantly higher with amikacin.
- Both antibiotics were dosed according to renal function.
Conclusions:
- Amikacin is a more effective treatment option than gentamicin for UTIs caused by gram-negative organisms resistant to other antibiotics.
- The study highlights the importance of appropriate dosing based on renal function for aminoglycosides.
- Amikacin offers a statistically significant advantage in achieving bacterial eradication in UTIs.