The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A retrospective Cohort study

George Demetriou1,2, Kasun Wanigasooriya1,3, Ahmed Elmaradny1

  • 1Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and Bariatric Surgery, Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Charles Hastings Way, Worcester, United Kingdom.

Frontiers in Surgery
|December 26, 2022
PubMed

Insights

The COVID-19 pandemic significantly delayed elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) surgeries. While patient outcomes remained similar, fewer patients received complete cholecystectomies during the pandemic recovery phase.

Area of Science:

  • Gastrointestinal Surgery
  • Epidemiology
  • Public Health

Background:

  • The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted elective surgical procedures globally.
  • Benign gallbladder disease management, including laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), was affected by these disruptions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of COVID-19 related delays on patient outcomes for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).
  • To compare surgical indications, waiting times, and outcomes between pre-pandemic and pandemic recovery phases.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 159 patients undergoing elective LC between March 2019-May 2019 (pre-pandemic) and April 2021-June 2021 (pandemic recovery).
  • Comparison of demographics, waiting times, surgical indications (inflammatory vs. non-inflammatory), intra-operative details, and patient outcomes between the two cohorts.
  • Statistical significance determined using a p-value < 0.05.

Main Results:

  • The pandemic recovery cohort had significantly longer waiting times for LC (p=0.0001).
  • Fewer patients in the recovery cohort underwent complete cholecystectomy (p=0.04).
  • No significant differences were observed in intra-operative times or patient outcomes between the groups.

Conclusions:

  • COVID-19 related delays impacted the management of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients, altering surgical indications and procedure completion.
  • Despite delays, patient outcomes were not significantly different, but further high-evidence studies are needed to confirm these findings and guide recommendations.