Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

6.7K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
6.7K
Anatomy of the Eyeball01:20

Anatomy of the Eyeball

7.3K
The eye is a spherical, hollow structure composed of three tissue layers. The outer layer — the fibrous tunic, comprises the sclera — a white structure — and the cornea, which is transparent. The sclera encompasses some of the ocular surface, most of which is not visible. However, the 'white of the eye' is distinctively visible in humans compared to other species. The cornea, a clear covering at the front of the eye, enables light penetration. The eye's middle...
7.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Impact of peripheral optical errors in age-related macular degeneration.

Journal of optometry·2026
Same author

Peripheral refractive errors in pseudophakic eyes: <i>in vitro</i> evaluation and optical simulation.

Biomedical optics express·2026
Same author

Principles of a Non-orthogonal Optical Surface with Potential for Correction of Irregular Astigmatism.

Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)·2026
Same author

Roadmap on advances in visual and physiological optics.

Journal of optics (2010)·2025
Same author

Myopia control and modulation transfer functions for multisegment spectacle lenses.

Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)·2025
Same author

Off-axis imagery through two multi-segment lenses for myopia treatment.

Biomedical optics express·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 15, 2025

Measurement of Vibration Detection Threshold and Tactile Spatial Acuity in Human Subjects
07:32

Measurement of Vibration Detection Threshold and Tactile Spatial Acuity in Human Subjects

Published on: September 1, 2016

12.8K

Peripheral detection acuity for interference fringes and screen-based Gabor gratings.

Durgasri Jaisankar1, Marwan Suheimat1, Robert Rosén2

  • 1Centre for Vision and Eye Research, Queensland University of Technology, Australia.

Biomedical Optics Express
|January 2, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Peripheral vision detection acuity is higher with interference fringes than Gabor gratings. Sharper Gabor gratings (less attenuated) yielded better results, suggesting more visible cycles benefit peripheral detection more than on-axis.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing
06:25

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing

Published on: February 23, 2024

676
Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
07:11

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential

Published on: May 25, 2020

6.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 15, 2025

Measurement of Vibration Detection Threshold and Tactile Spatial Acuity in Human Subjects
07:32

Measurement of Vibration Detection Threshold and Tactile Spatial Acuity in Human Subjects

Published on: September 1, 2016

12.8K
Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing
06:25

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing

Published on: February 23, 2024

676
Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
07:11

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential

Published on: May 25, 2020

6.4K

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Visual Neuroscience
  • Optics

Background:

  • Visual acuity, the ability to discern fine spatial details, is crucial for visual function.
  • Understanding how optical properties and stimulus characteristics influence visual acuity in both central (on-axis) and peripheral vision is essential.
  • Interference fringes and Gabor gratings are established stimuli for measuring visual acuity, each with distinct optical properties.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare on-axis and peripheral detection acuities using interference fringes (bypassing eye optics) and adaptive optics-corrected Gabor gratings.
  • To investigate the effect of Gabor grating attenuation (edge sharpness) on detection acuity in different visual field locations.
  • To theoretically analyze the contribution of spatial frequency broadening and visible cycles to peripheral grating acuity.

Main Methods:

  • Measurement of on-axis and peripheral detection acuities using interference fringes.
  • Measurement of on-axis and peripheral detection acuities using screen-based Gabor gratings with an adaptive optics system.
  • Systematic variation of the Gaussian envelope's attenuation magnitude in Gabor gratings.

Main Results:

  • Peripheral detection acuities were consistently higher for interference fringes compared to Gabor gratings.
  • Gabor gratings with less attenuation (sharper edges) resulted in higher detection acuities than more attenuated gratings.
  • Theoretical analysis indicated that while spatial frequency broadening from sharp edges had minimal impact, a greater number of visible cycles in less attenuated Gabors benefited peripheral detection.

Conclusions:

  • Interference fringes provide a more accurate measure of peripheral detection acuity by eliminating optical aberrations.
  • The number of visible cycles, rather than the absence of spatial frequency broadening, is more critical for high detection acuity in peripheral vision.
  • Stimulus design, specifically the balance between edge sharpness and the number of visible cycles, significantly impacts visual acuity measurements across the visual field.