Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Interprofessional collaboration and patient-reported outcomes: a secondary data analysis based on large scale survey
Laura Kaiser1, Edmund A M Neugebauer2, Dawid Pieper3,4,5,6,7
1Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany. Laura.Kaiser@uni-wh.de.
Interprofessional collaboration (IPC) at the department level showed a small positive association with fewer patient-reported complications. However, overall evidence linking IPC to patient outcomes remains inconclusive, suggesting further research into specific IPC characteristics is needed.
Area of Science:
- Healthcare Management
- Patient Outcomes Research
- Interprofessional Education and Practice
Background:
- Interprofessional collaboration (IPC) is crucial for patient care, but its impact on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is not well-established.
- This study investigates the relationship between employee-perceived IPC and PROs in inpatient clinical settings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the association between employee-rated interprofessional collaboration and patient-reported outcomes.
- To identify specific components of IPC that may influence patient outcomes in a clinical inpatient setting.
Main Methods:
- Secondary analysis of patient and employee survey data (2003-2016) from Picker Institute Germany.
- Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for IPC items and ordered logistic regression for PROs.
- Adjustments for patient/employee demographics and multiple hypothesis testing.
Main Results:
- Department-specific IPC showed a statistically significant, albeit small, association with improved PROs regarding post-discharge complications (OR 1.07).
- No other significant associations were found between IPC components and overall PROs.
- Exploratory analysis indicated positive associations for surgical and internal medicine patients, but ambiguous results for pediatric patients.
Conclusions:
- The link between department-level IPC and patient-reported outcomes remains unclear, with marginal effect sizes observed.
- Future research should differentiate between types of IPC and explore their specific mechanisms of action.
- Understanding nuanced aspects of IPC is essential for improving patient care and outcomes.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Data Collection I
Nursing Clinical Information System
A Nursing Clinical Information System (NCIS) is a specialized type of healthcare information system tailored to meet the unique needs of nursing practice. It incorporates the principles of nursing informatics to streamline information management and improve the quality of care delivery.
Critical attributes of NCIS include:
Nursing Assessment
The nurse collects all aspects of the patient's health in the initial assessment, establishing priorities for ongoing focused assessments...
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...

