Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Making MR Imaging Child's Play - Pediatric Neuroimaging Protocol, Guidelines and Procedure
Published on: July 30, 2009
Involving children and young people in paediatric research priority setting: a narrative review
Laura Postma1,2, Malou L Luchtenberg2,3, A A Eduard Verhagen2,4
1Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands l.postma@umcg.nl.
Insights
The James Lind Alliance (JLA) approach is common for involving children and young people (CYP) in research agendas, but their impact is rarely fully reported. More detailed impact reporting is needed to demonstrate the value of CYP involvement in research.
Area of Science:
- Paediatric Research
- Health Services Research
- Patient and Public Involvement
Background:
- Involving children and young people (CYP) in research is crucial for developing relevant paediatric research agendas.
- Understanding the methods and impact of CYP involvement is essential for effective patient and public involvement in research.
- Existing literature often lacks comprehensive reporting on the impact of involving CYP in research development.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe methods used for involving children and young people (CYP) in developing paediatric research agendas.
- To evaluate the reported impact of involving CYP in research development, categorizing it into focused, diffuse, and research impact.
- To identify gaps in the evaluation and reporting of CYP involvement in research.
Main Methods:
- A narrative review of four major databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Google Scholar) was conducted.
- Studies published between October 2016 and January 2022 involving CYP in research agenda development were included.
- Included studies were in English and detailed the methods of CYP engagement and any reported impact.
Main Results:
- Twenty-two studies involving CYP aged 6–25 years were included.
- The James Lind Alliance (JLA) approach was the most frequently used method (n=16), with limited variation in other methods.
- Impact reporting was sparse: focused impact in nine studies, diffuse impact in zero studies, and research impact in three studies.
Conclusions:
- The James Lind Alliance (JLA) approach is the predominant method for involving children and young people (CYP) in research agenda setting.
- Current evaluations and reporting of the impact of involving CYP in research are incomplete.
- Enhanced reporting of the impact of CYP involvement is necessary to justify costs and convince researchers of its benefits.
Objective:
The objective of this study is twofold: first, to describe the methods used when involving children and young people (CYP) in developing a paediatric research agenda and, second, to evaluate how the existing literature describes the impact of involving CYP. We distinguish three forms of impact: impact on the research agenda (focused impact), impact on researchers and CYP (diffuse impact) and impact on future research (research impact).
Design:
A narrative review of MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science and Google Scholar was conducted from October 2016 to January 2022. The included studies involved at least one CYP in developing a research agenda and were published in English.
Results:
22 studies were included; the CYP involved were aged between 6 years and 25 years. Little variation was found in the methods used to involve them. The methods used were James Lind Alliance (JLA) approach (n=16), focus groups (n=2), workshop (n=2), research prioritisation by affected communities (n=1) and combined methods (n=1). Impact was rarely described: focused impact in nine studies, diffuse impact in zero studies and research impact in three studies.
Conclusion:
This study concludes that the JLA approach is most frequently used to involve CYP and that all methods used to involve them are rarely evaluated. It also concludes that the reported impact of involving CYPs is incomplete. This study implies that to convince sceptical researchers of the benefits of involving CYPs and to justify the costs, more attention should be paid to reporting these impacts.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion

