Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Structures of Solids02:22

Structures of Solids

14.4K
Solids in which the atoms, ions, or molecules are arranged in a definite repeating pattern are known as crystalline solids. Metals and ionic compounds typically form ordered, crystalline solids. A crystalline solid has a precise melting temperature because each atom or molecule of the same type is held in place with the same forces or energy. Amorphous solids or non-crystalline solids (or, sometimes, glasses) which lack an ordered internal structure and are randomly arranged. Substances that...
14.4K
Lattice Centering and Coordination Number02:33

Lattice Centering and Coordination Number

9.8K
The structure of a crystalline solid, whether a metal or not, is best described by considering its simplest repeating unit, which is referred to as its unit cell. The unit cell consists of lattice points that represent the locations of atoms or ions. The entire structure then consists of this unit cell repeating in three dimensions. The three different types of unit cells present in the cubic lattice are illustrated in Figure 1.
Types of Unit Cells
Imagine taking a large number of identical...
9.8K
Bewley Lattice Diagram01:12

Bewley Lattice Diagram

805
The Bewley lattice diagram, developed by L. V. Bewley, effectively organizes the reflections occurring during transmission-line transients. It visually represents how voltage waves propagate and reflect within a transmission line, making it easier to understand the complex interactions that occur.
805

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A modified Delphi consensus on tenosynovial giant cell tumour and giant cell tumour of bone : a report from the Birmingham Orthopaedic Oncology Meeting (BOOM).

The bone & joint journal·2026
Same author

Complications of PI to PIII hemipelvic resections for intermediate and malignant tumours : a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bone & joint open·2026
Same author

What are the surgical and oncologic outcomes, as well as the complications, associated with pre-operative radiotherapy in patients with low-grade soft-tissue sarcoma?

International journal of clinical oncology·2026
Same author

Alkalization and cell wall remodeling mark the fruit abscission zone maturation in table olive.

Journal of experimental botany·2026
Same author

Reduced risk of dementia with recombinant zoster vaccine in US adults age 65 or older.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2026
Same author

Exploring the Anti-Inflammatory Mechanism of Boletus edulis Based on UPLC-MS/MS Combined With Network Pharmacology, Molecular Docking, and Experimental Validation.

Chemistry & biodiversity·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 14, 2025

Indirect Fabrication of Lattice Metals with Thin Sections Using Centrifugal Casting
08:32

Indirect Fabrication of Lattice Metals with Thin Sections Using Centrifugal Casting

Published on: May 14, 2016

12.6K

Image-Based Geometrical Characterization of Nodes in Additively Manufactured Lattice Structures.

Bill Lozanovski1,2, David Downing1,2, Rance Tino1,2,3

  • 1RMIT Centre for Additive Manufacture, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.

3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing
|January 19, 2023
PubMed
Summary

This study explores how the geometry of nodes in additively manufactured lattice structures differs from their idealized designs. Using X-ray microcomputed tomography and a custom software tool, researchers analyzed the geometry of nodes in face-centered cubic and axial strut lattices made via selective laser melting. The findings show that nodes in real-world AM structures differ from CAD models, which can affect how accurately numerical models predict mechanical behavior. The study proposes that understanding these deviations is a key step toward improving lattice design and simulation accuracy.

Keywords:
build qualitycomputed tomographydefectslattice structuresselective laser meltingadditive manufacturing lattice structuresgeometrical characterizationnode analysismicrocomputed tomography

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Characterizing Dissipative Elastic Metamaterials Produced by Additive Manufacturing
09:39

Characterizing Dissipative Elastic Metamaterials Produced by Additive Manufacturing

Published on: June 28, 2024

1.0K
Fabrication and Characterization of Optical Tissue Phantoms Containing Macrostructure
10:22

Fabrication and Characterization of Optical Tissue Phantoms Containing Macrostructure

Published on: February 12, 2018

10.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 14, 2025

Indirect Fabrication of Lattice Metals with Thin Sections Using Centrifugal Casting
08:32

Indirect Fabrication of Lattice Metals with Thin Sections Using Centrifugal Casting

Published on: May 14, 2016

12.6K
Characterizing Dissipative Elastic Metamaterials Produced by Additive Manufacturing
09:39

Characterizing Dissipative Elastic Metamaterials Produced by Additive Manufacturing

Published on: June 28, 2024

1.0K
Fabrication and Characterization of Optical Tissue Phantoms Containing Macrostructure
10:22

Fabrication and Characterization of Optical Tissue Phantoms Containing Macrostructure

Published on: February 12, 2018

10.7K

Area of Science:

  • Additive manufacturing in mechanical engineering
  • Computational modeling in materials science

Background:

Additive manufacturing allows for the creation of lattice structures with tailored mechanical and thermal properties. Prior research has shown that lattice structures often contain geometric deviations in struts, which affect numerical predictions. However, the geometry of nodes remains poorly understood despite their influence on structural performance. No prior work had resolved the impact of node-level deviations in lattice structures. This gap motivated the need to examine as-manufactured node geometries in detail. Understanding how nodes differ from CAD models can help improve design accuracy. Prior knowledge has shown that struts are commonly studied, but nodes are less explored. This uncertainty drove the development of new methods to analyze node geometry. The goal is to bridge the gap between CAD expectations and real-world AM outcomes.

Purpose Of The Study:

This study aimed to investigate the geometrical characteristics of nodes in additively manufactured lattice structures. The specific problem is the lack of detailed understanding of how node geometry deviates from CAD models. The motivation stems from the need to improve numerical models for AM lattices. Current models often overlook node-level variations, which may affect mechanical predictions. The researchers propose to use μCT imaging to capture real-world node geometries. This approach allows for quantification of deviations at the node level. The study focuses on face-centered cubic and axial strut lattices fabricated via selective laser melting. The goal is to develop tools for isolating and analyzing node geometries.

Main Methods:

The study employed X-ray microcomputed tomography to capture detailed images of as-manufactured lattice structures. A custom software tool was developed to isolate and classify nodal joints from μCT-derived cross-sectional slices. The tool enabled automated extraction of geometrical properties from each node. These properties were compared with their idealized CAD model counterparts. The method involved analyzing face-centered cubic and axial strut lattices fabricated via selective laser melting. Cross-sectional slices were used to assess deviations in node geometry. The process included auto-isolation of nodal regions to ensure accurate comparisons. The researchers propose that this method improves the ability to quantify geometric uncertainties.

Main Results:

The study found significant variations between as-manufactured node geometries and their CAD counterparts. These deviations were quantified using μCT-derived cross-sectional slices. The custom tool successfully isolated and classified nodal joints for analysis. Face-centered cubic and axial strut lattices showed distinct geometrical differences. Node geometry deviations were found to be non-uniform across the lattice structure. The results suggest that node-level uncertainties may affect mechanical predictions. The researchers propose that these findings can inform improved lattice design. Quantification of defects provides insight into how nodes differ from idealized models.

Conclusions:

The authors suggest that quantifying node-level geometrical deviations improves numerical modeling accuracy. Their findings indicate that as-manufactured nodes differ from CAD models in non-uniform ways. This research is an initial step toward better node design for AM lattices. The study proposes that understanding node geometry helps refine lattice performance predictions. The researchers suggest that their method can be extended to other lattice types and AM processes. The results support the need for more detailed node-level analysis in AM research. The authors propose that future work should focus on integrating these findings into design workflows. This approach may enhance the reliability of numerical simulations for AM structures.

The study quantifies geometrical deviations in as-manufactured nodes of lattice structures using μCT imaging and a custom tool.

Face-centered cubic and face-centered cubic with axial struts lattices fabricated via selective laser melting were studied.

Node geometry significantly influences mechanical behavior and numerical predictions of lattice structures.

A custom software tool was developed to auto-isolate and classify nodal joints from μCT cross-sectional slices.

Geometrical properties were extracted from isolated nodal cross sections and compared with CAD models.

The authors suggest that quantifying node-level deviations improves numerical model accuracy and lattice design.