Absorbable Barbed Continuous versus Nonabsorbable Nonbarbed Interrupted Suturing Methods for Donor-site Closure of

Daiki Kitano1, Tadashi Nomura1, Shunsuke Sakakibara1

  • 1Department of Plastic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.

Insights

Comparing surgical closure methods for rectus abdominis myocutaneous (RAMC) flap harvest, this study found no significant difference in abdominal incisional hernia rates or closure time between absorbable barbed continuous (ABC) and non-absorbable non-barbed interrupted (nAnBI) techniques.

Area of Science:

  • Plastic Surgery
  • Surgical Oncology
  • Hernia Repair

Background:

  • Abdominal incisional hernia is a known complication following rectus abdominis myocutaneous (RAMC) flap harvest.
  • Surgical techniques for donor-site closure aim to minimize complications and operative time.
  • Comparing novel barbed sutures with traditional methods is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the incidence of abdominal incisional hernias after RAMC flap harvest.
  • To evaluate donor-site closure time between absorbable barbed continuous (ABC) and non-absorbable non-barbed interrupted (nAnBI) closure methods.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective study of 145 patients undergoing free RAMC flap reconstruction for head and neck cancer.
  • Patients were divided into two groups based on closure method: nAnBI (January 2012-August 2016) and ABC (September 2016-March 2020).
  • Comparison of hernia incidence and average donor-site closure time, with follow-up of at least 90 days for 116 patients.

Main Results:

  • The incidence of abdominal incisional hernia was 0% in the nAnBI group and 5.1% in the ABC group (p=0.244), showing no statistically significant difference.
  • Average donor-site closure times were 127.6 minutes for nAnBI and 111.3 minutes for ABC (p=0.122), also without significant difference.
  • A trend suggested increased hernia occurrence and shorter closure time with the ABC method.

Conclusions:

  • Neither the nAnBI nor the ABC method demonstrated a significant difference in hernia incidence or closure time.
  • The ABC method showed a trend towards faster closure and slightly higher hernia rates.
  • Further validation through a randomized prospective multicenter study is recommended for the ABC method.

Related Concept Videos