Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

7.1K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
7.1K
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

214
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
214
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

11.6K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
11.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Divergent modes of episodic organization underlie whether emotional learning enhances memory across event boundaries.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

Role of the striatum in counterfactual information seeking.

Social cognitive and affective neuroscience·2026
Same author

Effect of Neoadjuvant Chemo-Hormonal Therapy on Reducing Recurrence in Patients With Very High-Risk Prostate Cancer Undergoing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.

International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association·2026
Same author

The Curious <i>U</i>: Integrating Theories Linking Knowledge and Information-Seeking Behavior.

Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science·2025
Same author

Broad brain networks support curiosity-motivated incidental learning of naturalistic dynamic stimuli with and without monetary incentives.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025
Same author

An explainable artificial intelligence handbook for psychologists: Methods, opportunities, and challenges.

Psychological methods·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 12, 2025

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis
13:51

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis

Published on: November 9, 2011

20.0K

Stimulus-specific random effects inflate false-positive classification accuracy in

Shogo Kajimura1, Takahiro Hoshino2, Kou Murayama3

  • 1Faculty of Information and Human Science, Kyoto Institute of Technology, Matsugasakihashigami-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto-shi, Kyoto 606-8585, Japan.

Neuroimage
|January 27, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Traditional by-subject analysis in multivariate-voxel pattern analysis (MVPA) inflates Type-1 error rates. Generalized linear mixed-effects modeling offers a solution by controlling for random stimulus effects, maintaining accurate statistical inference.

Keywords:
Generalized mixed-effects modellingGroup-level analysisMultivariate-voxel-pattern-analysisRandom stimulus effectType-1 error

More Related Videos

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

16.9K
Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
14:27

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

15.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 12, 2025

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis
13:51

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis

Published on: November 9, 2011

20.0K
Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

16.9K
Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
14:27

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

15.7K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroimaging analysis
  • Machine learning in neuroscience

Background:

  • Multivariate-voxel pattern analysis (MVPA) is a common neuroimaging technique.
  • Current by-subject analysis methods in MVPA may lead to inflated Type-1 error rates.
  • This inflation is due to unaddressed variance from random stimulus effects common across subjects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify the limitations of traditional by-subject analysis in MVPA.
  • To propose and validate an alternative statistical approach for evaluating MVPA accuracy.
  • To demonstrate the impact of random stimulus effects on statistical inference in MVPA.

Main Methods:

  • Statistical simulations were used to compare analysis methods.
  • Real functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data were analyzed.
  • Generalized linear mixed-effects modeling was implemented as a proposed solution.
  • By-subject analysis was performed as the traditional comparison method.

Main Results:

  • The traditional by-subject analysis demonstrated significantly increased Type-1 error rates.
  • Generalized linear mixed-effects modeling successfully maintained nominal Type-1 error rates.
  • The proposed method accounts for random stimulus effects, improving statistical validity.

Conclusions:

  • By-subject analysis in MVPA inflates Type-1 error rates and should be used with caution.
  • Generalized linear mixed-effects modeling provides a statistically sound alternative for MVPA accuracy evaluation.
  • Incorporating random stimulus effects is crucial for accurate statistical inference in MVPA.