Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2025

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
Visualizing Uncertainty to Promote Clinicians' Understanding of Measurement Error
Niek Frans1,2, Benjamin Hummelen1, Casper J Albers2
1Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Abstract:
Measurement error is an inherent part of any test score. This uncertainty is generally communicated in ways that can be difficult to understand for clinical practitioners. In this empirical study, we evaluate the impact of several communication formats on the interpretation of measurement accuracy and its influence on the decision-making process in clinical practice. We provided 230 clinical practitioners with score reports in five formats: textual, error bar, violin plot, diamond plot, and quantile dot plot. We found that quantile dot plots significantly increased accuracy in the assessment of measurement uncertainty compared with other formats. However, a direct relation between visualization format and decision quality could not be found. Although traditional confidence intervals and error bars were favored by many participants due to their familiarity, responses revealed several misconceptions that make the suitability of these formats for communicating uncertainty questionable. Our results indicate that new visualization formats can successfully reduce errors in interpretation.
Related Concept Videos
Uncertainty: Overview
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

