A single institutional experience with suction thrombectomy in acute mesenteric ischemia

Allison K Mak1, Elizabeth A Andraska2, Katherine M Reitz2

  • 1University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, United States.

Insights

Catheter-based aspiration thrombectomy offers a minimally invasive option for acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI), potentially reducing bleeding risks. However, careful patient selection is crucial due to risks of bowel necrosis and sepsis.

Area of Science:

  • Vascular Surgery
  • Interventional Radiology
  • Gastroenterology

Background:

  • Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) traditionally requires open surgery or hybrid approaches.
  • Minimally invasive catheter-based aspiration thrombectomy is an emerging alternative.
  • This technique may reduce bleeding complications associated with thrombolytics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of catheter-based aspiration thrombectomy for high-risk AMI.
  • To assess the safety and efficacy of the Penumbra aspiration system in treating AMI.

Main Methods:

  • An institutional case series of five patients with high-risk AMI.
  • Treatment involved catheter-based aspiration thrombectomy using the Penumbra system.
  • Technical success was confirmed by intraoperative angiography.

Main Results:

  • All five cases demonstrated technically successful endovascular thrombectomy.
  • Postoperative complications included bowel necrosis and sepsis in some patients.
  • Intraoperative assessment of bowel viability was not performed.

Conclusions:

  • Catheter-based aspiration thrombectomy is technically feasible for high-risk AMI.
  • Patient selection is critical to mitigate risks of postoperative bowel necrosis and sepsis.
  • The lack of intraoperative bowel assessment is a limitation of current endovascular techniques.