Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Steps in Outbreak Investigation01:18

Steps in Outbreak Investigation

163
In the ever-evolving field of public health, statistical analysis serves as a cornerstone for understanding and managing disease outbreaks. By leveraging various statistical tools, health professionals can predict potential outbreaks, analyze ongoing situations, and devise effective responses to mitigate impact. For that to happen, there are a few possible stages of the analysis:
163
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

1.9K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
1.9K
Detection of Black Holes01:10

Detection of Black Holes

2.2K
Although black holes were theoretically postulated in the 1920s, they remained outside the domain of observational astronomy until the 1970s.
Their closest cousins are neutron stars, which are composed almost entirely of neutrons packed against each other, making them extremely dense. A neutron star has the same mass as the Sun but its diameter is only a few kilometers. Therefore, the escape velocity from their surface is close to the speed of light.
Not until the 1960s, when the first neutron...
2.2K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

6.7K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
6.7K
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System01:29

Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System

5.7K
The issues and trends in healthcare delivery are constantly changing. The COVID-19 pandemic is one recent issue that wreaked havoc on healthcare systems, causing a shortage of healthcare workers, high demand for medicines and supplies, and increased medical expenditure due to a lack of insurance. Other issues include rising healthcare costs and care fragmentation.
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
5.7K
Masking and Demasking Agents01:19

Masking and Demasking Agents

2.5K
EDTA titrations may necessitate masking and demasking agents to temporarily protect a particular metal ion in a mixture from the EDTA reaction. These agents facilitate the sequential analysis of the metal ions by forming stable complexes with some—but not all—metal ions during certain steps.
There are many masking agents, such as cyanide, fluoride, triethanolamine, thiourea, and 2,3-bis(sulfanyl)propan-1-ol (formerly 2,3-dimercapto-1-propanol), with the masking agent chosen based on...
2.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

NaYbF<sub>4</sub>@NaYF<sub>4</sub> Nanoparticles: Controlled Shell Growth and Shape-Dependent Cellular Uptake.

ACS applied materials & interfaces·2021
Same author

Identification of new potential antigen recognized by γδT cells in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII·2021
Same author

[Research progress of different mechanical stimulation regulating chondrocytes metabolism].

Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi·2020
Same author

Jisuikang Promotes the Repair of Spinal Cord Injury in Rats by Regulating NgR/RhoA/ROCK Signal Pathway.

Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM·2020
Same author

Long Non-coding RNA Expression Profiling Identifies a Four-Long Non-coding RNA Prognostic Signature for Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Mutant Glioma.

Frontiers in neurology·2020
Same author

[Different virulence Mycobacterium promotes RAW264.7 macrophage autophagy and phosphorylation of mTOR and AKT].

Xi bao yu fen zi mian yi xue za zhi = Chinese journal of cellular and molecular immunology·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 11, 2025

Author Spotlight: AI-Driven Trypanosome Species Detection from Microscopic Images
08:20

Author Spotlight: AI-Driven Trypanosome Species Detection from Microscopic Images

Published on: October 27, 2023

1.6K

A Survey of Machine Learning-Based Zero-Day Attack Detection: Challenges and Future Directions.

Yang Guo1

  • 1NIST, Gaithersburg, MD 20899.

Computer Communications
|February 6, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Machine learning (ML) offers a promising approach to detect zero-day attacks, which exploit unknown vulnerabilities. However, current ML methods struggle with accuracy and consistency across various attack types, highlighting the need for further research.

More Related Videos

DNA Virus Detection System Based on RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-SPM and Deep Learning
04:17

DNA Virus Detection System Based on RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-SPM and Deep Learning

Published on: May 10, 2024

840
Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification
08:05

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification

Published on: April 6, 2020

10.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 11, 2025

Author Spotlight: AI-Driven Trypanosome Species Detection from Microscopic Images
08:20

Author Spotlight: AI-Driven Trypanosome Species Detection from Microscopic Images

Published on: October 27, 2023

1.6K
DNA Virus Detection System Based on RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-SPM and Deep Learning
04:17

DNA Virus Detection System Based on RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-SPM and Deep Learning

Published on: May 10, 2024

840
Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification
08:05

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification

Published on: April 6, 2020

10.8K

Area of Science:

  • Cybersecurity
  • Computer Science
  • Artificial Intelligence

Background:

  • Zero-day attacks pose a significant threat by exploiting unknown software vulnerabilities.
  • Traditional signature-based detection is ineffective against zero-day threats due to the lack of prior signatures.
  • Machine learning (ML) presents a viable alternative for detecting zero-day attacks by analyzing behavioral patterns.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To conduct a comprehensive survey of ML-based approaches for zero-day attack detection.
  • To compare ML models, datasets, and evaluation metrics used in existing studies.
  • To identify challenges and recommend future research directions in ML-based zero-day attack detection.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic literature review of ML-based zero-day attack detection techniques.
  • Comparative analysis of different ML algorithms, including their application and performance.
  • Evaluation of datasets used for training and testing ML models.
  • Identification of key performance indicators such as accuracy, recall, and uniformity.

Main Results:

  • Existing ML-based methods show promise but exhibit limitations in accuracy, recall, and uniformity.
  • A wide range of ML models have been applied, with varying degrees of success.
  • Significant heterogeneity exists in the datasets and evaluation methodologies across studies.

Conclusions:

  • Despite advancements, current ML-based zero-day attack detection methods require improvement to address accuracy and consistency issues.
  • Further research is needed to overcome the identified challenges and enhance the robustness of ML solutions.
  • Future work should focus on developing more uniform and accurate detection strategies for diverse zero-day attack vectors.