Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

6.5K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.5K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.3K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.3K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

3.5K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
3.5K
Inductive Reasoning00:59

Inductive Reasoning

60.8K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
60.8K
Reasoning01:30

Reasoning

114
Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
114
Sensory Perception: Organization of the Somatosensory System01:11

Sensory Perception: Organization of the Somatosensory System

3.2K
The somatosensory system is the central and peripheral nervous system component that senses and processes touch, pressure, pain, temperature, and body position or proprioception. The process of sensation takes place at three levels:
The receptor level:
The receptor level is the first stage of sensation. It involves the detection of a stimulus by specialized sensory receptors. The stimulus must arrive within the receptor's receptive field. Next, the receptor converts the energy of the...
3.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Will I speak louder if I see you struggling to understand? Speech modifications in response to non-verbal visual cues of listening effort.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

Spatial Distance and Temporal Attentional Focus Modulate Voluntary Action Preparation and Awareness.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same author

Metacognition for Listening in Noise: The Role of Age and Hearing Loss.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same author

On the Coexistence of Captions and Sign Language as Accessibility Solutions in Educational Settings.

Audiology research·2026
Same author

Prevention of Postpartum Depression via a Digital ACT-Based Intervention: Evaluation of a Prototype Using Multiple Case Studies.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Monitoring optical properties of atmospheric aerosols at dome C, East Antarctic Plateau, provides insights into radiative transfer estimates.

Scientific reports·2025
Same journal

Blurred lines or clear boundaries? Synchrony and social dominance shape domain-specific self-other processing.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Knowability predicts curiosity and learning.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Throwing good effort after bad: Evidence for a sunk-cost effect in cognitive effort-based decision-making.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Cross-linguistic differences in incremental planning under uncertainty.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Sensory attenuation scales with the strength of action-outcome coupling: A psychophysical study.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Children's narrow learning bottleneck accelerates the emergence of statistical properties of language.

Cognition·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 9, 2025

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
09:13

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 22, 2015

16.6K

Sensory and multisensory reasoning: Is Bayesian updating modality-dependent?

Stefano Fait1, Stefania Pighin1, Andrea Passerini2

  • 1Center for Mind/Brain Sciences - CIMeC, University of Trento, Corso Bettini, n. 31 38068, Rovereto, TN, Italy.

Cognition
|February 15, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Bayesian updating relies on how information is processed. This study found that while single sensory inputs follow Bayesian assumptions, combined audio-visual information can lead to less accurate probability judgments, revealing a multisensory integration limitation.

Keywords:
Bayesian reasoningBelief updatingConservatismMultisensory integration

More Related Videos

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.0K
Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 9, 2025

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
09:13

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 22, 2015

16.6K
A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.0K
Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.4K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology

Background:

  • Bayesianism posits that probabilistic updating is independent of sensory modality.
  • Previous research has largely assumed modality independence in Bayesian updating models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether probability judgments align with Bayesian assumptions across different sensory modalities.
  • To examine the impact of audio-visual information on Bayesian updating and identify potential limitations in multisensory integration.

Main Methods:

  • Five experiments were conducted using visual and auditory stimuli.
  • Participants made probability judgments based on single-modality (auditory or visual) and multi-modality (audio-visual) information.
  • Experimental conditions included synergy, contrast, and double-contrast scenarios for audio-visual information.

Main Results:

  • Probability judgments conformed to Bayesian assumptions with single-modality information.
  • Audio-visual information led to a 'synergy-contrast effect,' where accuracy depended on whether individual modalities supported the joint hypothesis.
  • Accuracy was significantly reduced in contrast and double-contrast conditions compared to the synergy condition, approaching chance levels in the latter.

Conclusions:

  • The modality of information processing influences Bayesian updating, particularly in multisensory contexts.
  • A synergy-contrast effect was identified, demonstrating a violation of modality independence in Bayesian updating.
  • This finding highlights a significant, previously undocumented limitation of multisensory integration.