Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2025

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
Published on: February 19, 2018
Investigating the influence of local and personal common ground on memory for conversation using an online
Daniel R Nault1, Rohit Voleti2, Matthew Nicastro1
1Department of Psychology, Queen's University.
Abstract:
To maintain efficiency during conversation, interlocutors form and retrieve memory representations for the shared understanding or common ground that they have with their partner. Here, an online referential communication task (RCT) was used in two experiments to examine whether the strength and type of common ground between dyads influence their ability to form and recall referential labels for images. Results from both experiments show a significant association between the strength of common ground formed between dyads for images during the RCT and their verbatim-but not semantic-recall memory for image descriptions about a week later. Participants who generated the image descriptions during the RCT also showed superior verbatim and semantic recall memory performance. In Experiment 2, a group of friends with pre-existing personal common ground were significantly more efficient in their use of words to describe images during the RCT than a group of strangers without personal common ground. However, personal common ground did not lead to enhanced recall memory performance. Together, these findings provide evidence that individuals can remember some verbatim words and phrases from conversations, and partially support the theoretical notion that common ground and memory are intricately linked conversational processes. The null findings with regard to semantic recall memory suggest that the structured nature of the RCT may have constrained the types of memory representations that individuals formed during the interaction. Findings are discussed in relation to the multidimensional nature of common ground and the importance of developing more natural conversational tasks for future work. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
More Related Videos
07:36Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
Published on: November 30, 2018
05:48Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception
Published on: August 9, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Nonconscious Mimicry
Relationship Formation
Social Proof
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
Robbers Cave
Levels of Communication I: Intrapersonal, Interpersonal, and Small Group
We can participate in these relationships through verbal, nonverbal, and mediated communication. We engage in verbal communication when we use words during our interaction to convey specific meanings. On the other hand, nonverbal communication refers to various factors that can impact how we understand each other—for example, facial expressions.
We interact with others using mediated technologies like the...