Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping02:05

Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping

39.1K
People can go to great lengths to protect their self-image and present themselves in ways that they want others to see them. Sociologist Erving Goffman presented the idea that a person is like an actor on a stage. Calling his theory dramaturgy, Goffman believed that we use “impression management” to present ourselves to others as we hope to be perceived. Each situation is a new scene, and individuals perform different roles depending on who is present (Goffman, 1959). Think about...
39.1K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

12.9K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.9K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

5.6K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
5.6K
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

11.0K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
11.0K
False Memories01:18

False Memories

127
False memories represent a cognitive distortion in which individuals recall events that did not happen, or remember them in an altered form. This phenomenon highlights the brain's constructive nature in processing and recalling memories, emphasizing that memory is not a perfect representation of past events but rather a dynamic reconstruction influenced by various factors.
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
127
Beck's Cognitive Therapy01:25

Beck's Cognitive Therapy

95
Cognitive therapy is a psychological approach designed to address distortions in thinking, which can lead to negative emotions and unrealistic beliefs. These cognitive distortions often influence how individuals interpret and respond to situations, exacerbating emotional distress. Below are some prevalent cognitive distortions, their characteristics, and examples of how they manifest in thought processes.
Arbitrary Inference
Arbitrary inference involves making conclusions without sufficient...
95

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Bootstrapping and Persuasive Argumentation.

Argumentation·2024
Same journal

The Fallacy of Misplaced Presumption.

Argumentation·2023
Same journal

Two Types of Refutation in Philosophical Argumentation.

Argumentation·2022
Same journal

Twitter Activists' Argumentation Through Subdiscussions: Theory, Method and Illustration of the Controversy Surrounding Sustainable Fashion.

Argumentation·2022
Same journal

Bothsiderism.

Argumentation·2022
Same journal

Annotating Argument Schemes.

Argumentation·2021
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 9, 2025

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

8.6K

Committing Fallacies and the Appearance Condition.

Hans V Hansen1

  • 1Centre for Research in Reasoning, Argumentation and Rhetoric, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON N9B 3P4 Canada.

Argumentation
|February 23, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study examines why weak arguments appear valid, exploring the consequences of this "appearance condition" in fallacies. It identifies causes of misperception in argumentation, aiding diverse models of reasoning.

Keywords:
Appearance conditionArgument caused misperceptionAristotleCausing a fallacyCommitting a fallacyDiscursive environment caused misperceptionFallacyFrancis BaconObserving a fallacyPerceiver caused misperceptionPerceiving asPerceiving thatPerspective caused misperception

More Related Videos

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
06:51

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

Published on: April 6, 2018

8.5K
Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

10.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 9, 2025

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

8.6K
The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
06:51

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

Published on: April 6, 2018

8.5K
Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

10.1K

Area of Science:

  • Philosophy
  • Logic
  • Argumentation Theory

Background:

  • The concept of fallacies in argumentation is debated.
  • The 'appearance condition' suggests fallacies seem valid, which is not universally accepted.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the consequences of including the 'appearance condition' in the definition of fallacies.
  • To differentiate between committing, causing, and observing a fallacy.
  • To identify causes of misperceiving weak arguments as acceptable.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of argumentation theory.
  • Exploration of the 'appearance condition' of fallacies.
  • Identification of distinct roles in fallacy occurrence (committing, causing, observing).

Main Results:

  • Distinctions are made between committing, causing, and observing fallacies.
  • Several categories of misperception are identified: argument-caused, perspective-caused, discursive environment-caused, and perceiver-caused.
  • The framework accommodates various argumentation models.

Conclusions:

  • Including the 'appearance condition' has significant implications for understanding fallacies.
  • Misperception of weak arguments stems from multiple interacting factors.
  • The proposed framework offers a general approach to analyzing fallacies across different argumentation standards.