Comparison of autosurge versus surge protocols for discontinuous-flow centrifugation plateletapheresis

Autosurge is a new, highly automated protocol for collecting platelets by centrifugation plateletapheresis. It was developed to allow optimal cell collections with less operator effort than was required with the earlier, standard Surge protocol. The authors compared the cellular content of 201 platelet concentrates prepared by Surge with that of 120 concentrates prepared by Autosurge by the same group of operators, using the same cell separator. Platelet yields were similar (p = 0.775) for both protocols (mean X 10(-11) were 3.54 and 3.57 for Surge and Autosurge, respectively) and when subdivided according to preapheresis donor blood platelet counts, hematocrits, and leukocyte counts. Although platelet yields were comparable in concentrates prepared by either protocol, high donor hematocrit had less adverse effect on platelet yield when the Autosurge protocol was used. The composition of concentrates differed between protocols in that leukocytes contamination was significantly less (p less than 0.001) in units collected by Autosurge (3.4 X 10(8)) than in those collected by Surge (5.8 X 10(8)). Operator involvement can be less intense with Autosurge because the protocol includes automatic adjustment of cell separator settings for optimal plateletapheresis. The results of the direct comparison study were confirmed by data from 509 additional plateletapheresis procedures performed during routine blood center operation. Autosurge should replace Surge because the former easily produces platelet concentrates that contain fewer leukocytes without compromising platelet yields.