Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2025

08:53
Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community
Published on: May 31, 2019
5.2K
The social media context interferes with truth discernment.
Ziv Epstein1, Nathaniel Sirlin2, Antonio Arechar2,3
1MIT Media Lab, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Science Advances
|March 3, 2023
Summary
Social media sharing intentions impair truth discernment. Participants considering sharing news on social media were worse at identifying false headlines, suggesting increased vulnerability to misinformation.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Media Psychology
- Information Science
Background:
- Widespread concern exists regarding misinformation on social media platforms.
- The social media environment may increase susceptibility to false claims.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if considering social media sharing reduces truth discrimination.
- To determine if the social context of sharing influences belief in false news.
Main Methods:
- A large online experiment with 3,157 American participants.
- Participants judged the accuracy of headlines related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and political news.
- Evaluated accuracy alone versus evaluating accuracy with sharing intentions.
Main Results:
- Participants were less accurate at distinguishing true from false headlines when they considered sharing.
- Indicating sharing intentions alongside accuracy evaluation impaired truth discernment compared to accuracy evaluation alone.
Conclusions:
- The act of considering sharing on social media can impair individuals' ability to discern truth from falsehood.
- Social media's inherent sharing features may heighten vulnerability to believing misinformation.
Related Concept Videos
Social Proof
27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K
Group Polarization
34.4K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
34.4K
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
50.2K
According to Charles Cooley, we base our image on what we think other people see (Cooley 1902). We imagine how we must appear to others, then react to this speculation. We don certain clothes, prepare our hair in a particular manner, wear makeup, use cologne, and the like—all with the notion that our presentation of ourselves is going to affect how others perceive us. We expect a certain reaction, and, if lucky, we get the one we desire and feel good about it. But more than that, Cooley...
50.2K
Groupthink
44.5K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
44.5K
Social Traps
22.5K
Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned...
22.5K
Social Facilitation
32.0K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
32.0K

