Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2025
Murine Model of Advanced Periodontitis Induced by Nylon Ligature in the Second Upper Molar
Published on: May 30, 2025
Clinical and microbiological comparison of knotless/barbed and silk sutures for impacted third-molar surgery
Ahmet E Uysal1, Metin Sencimen1, Aydin Ozkan2
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Gulhane Faculty of Dentistry, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Türkiye.
Background:
Several types of suture materials are available for oral surgery. However, the most used non-resorbable suture in oral surgery is 3/0 silk. The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of knotless/barbed sutures with silk sutures during the postoperative period after the third molar surgery in terms of clinical and microbiological parameters.
Methods:
The study comprised 38 patients who underwent surgical extraction of a mandibular impacted third molar. The patients were divided into two groups. The mucoperiosteal flap was closed using 3/0 knotless/barbed sutures for the test group and 3/0 silk sutures for the control group. The duration of suturing was recorded during surgery. Pain level, postoperative edema, and trismus were measured at 3 and 7 days after surgery. The status of plaque formation on the sutures was scored using the Plaque Index at 3 and 7 days after the surgery. At 7 days, the suture materials were removed and submitted to the laboratory for microbiological analysis. The level of pain during suture removal was also recorded by a Visual Analog Scale.
Results:
The duration of suturing in the barbed sutures group was found significantly lower than in silk sutures (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the suture types in terms of trismus and edema at 3 and 7 days after surgery (P>0.05). On the third day after surgery and during suture, removal pain scores were statistically significantly lower in the barbed suture group than in the silk suture group (P<0.05). The Plaque Index values of the barbed sutures were statistically significantly lower than that of the silk sutures at 3 and 7 days after surgery (P<0.05). Aerobic, anaerobic, and aerobic/anaerobic mean colony forming units (CFUs) were statistically significantly lower in the barbed suture group than in the silk suture group (P<0.05).
Conclusions:
Barbed sutures increase the ease of operation and patient comfort with less postoperative pain than silk sutures. Additionally, less plaque accumulation and lower bacterial colonization were found on the barbed/knotless sutures than on the silk sutures.
