Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2026

A Murine Model of Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery for the Study of Restenosis
Published on: May 14, 2013
Long-Term Outcomes of Revascularization Compared to Deferral in Stable Coronary Artery Disease: a Review
1CAMC Institute for Academic Medicine, 3200 MacCorkle Ave. SE, Charleston, WV, 25304, USA.
Insights
For stable coronary artery disease, deferring revascularization shows similar long-term outcomes and safety compared to performing the procedure. This review assesses available literature on revascularization versus deferral strategies.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Stable coronary artery disease (CAD) management involves decisions between revascularization and medical therapy.
- The safety and efficacy of deferring revascularization in stable CAD require ongoing evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess and compare the long-term outcomes of revascularization versus deferral of intervention in patients with stable coronary artery disease.
- To review existing literature on the safety and effectiveness of both management strategies.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of available literature.
- Analysis of studies comparing revascularization outcomes against deferral in stable CAD patients.
Main Results:
- The overall safety of managing stable coronary artery disease has been established.
- Limited studies have directly compared deferral versus revascularization.
- Current literature suggests no significant difference in outcomes between revascularization and deferral in stable CAD.
Conclusions:
- Deferral of revascularization appears to be a safe strategy with comparable long-term outcomes to intervention in stable coronary artery disease.
- Further research may be warranted to solidify these findings and guide clinical decision-making.
Purpose Of Review:
The aim of this study is assessing the long-term outcomes of revascularization compared to deferral in stable coronary artery disease with available literature.
Recent Findings:
The overall safety of stable coronary artery disease using IFR has been well established. There have been very few studies that have examined the safety of deferral of revascularization vs revascularization. As seen in listed literature, there appears to be no difference between revascularization compared to deferral in stable coronary artery disease.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care

