Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 2, 2025

Data Processing Methods for 3D Seismic Imaging of Subsurface Volcanoes: Applications to the Tarim Flood Basalt
Published on: August 7, 2017
Seismic Signal Analysis Based on Variational Mode Decomposition and Hilbert Transform for Ground Intrusion Activity
Yuan Sun1, Dongdong Qian1, Jing Zheng1,2
1College of Geoscience and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology (Beijing), Haidian, Beijing 100083, China.
Abstract:
The identification of ground intrusion is a key and important technology in the national public security field. In this paper, a novel variational mode decomposition (VMD) and Hilbert transform (HT) is proposed for the classification of seismic signals generated by ground intrusion activities using a seismic sensing system. Firstly, the representative seismic data, including bicycles, vehicles, footsteps, excavations, and environmental noises, were collected through the designed experiment. Secondly, each original datum is decomposed through VMD and five Band-limited intrinsic mode functions (BIMF) are obtained, respectively, which will be used to generate a corresponding marginal spectrum that can reflect the actual frequency component of the signal accurately by HT. Then, three features related to the marginal spectrum, including marginal spectrum energy, marginal spectrum entropy, and marginal spectrum dominant frequency, are extracted for the analysis of the multi-classification using the support vector machine (SVM) classifier with the LIBSVM library. For the sake of testing and verifying the effectiveness of the proposed variational mode decomposition and Hilbert transform (VMD-HT) technique, the evaluation indicators including accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-Score are used and the results are compared with the time domain, frequency domain, ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD), and empirical wavelet transform (EWT) combined with the HT analysis method. The performance of the VMD-HT method for ground intrusion activity classification provides an average value of 99.50%, 98.76%, 98.76%, and 98.75% for the four evaluation indicators, which are higher than all the other contrasted methods.
More Related Videos
08:27Author Spotlight: Efficient Image Recognition Using Directional Gradient Histogram Technique and Support Vector Machines
Published on: January 5, 2024
07:14Tracking Infiltration Front Depth Using Time-lapse Multi-offset Gathers Collected with Array Antenna Ground Penetrating Radar
Published on: May 1, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Classification of Signals
A continuous-time signal holds a value at every instant in time, representing information seamlessly. In contrast, a discrete-time signal holds values only at specific moments, often denoted as x(n), where...
Discrete Fourier Transform
IR Spectrum Peak Splitting: Symmetric vs Asymmetric Vibrations
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...
¹H NMR Signal Multiplicity: Splitting Patterns
Basic signals of Fourier Transform
The sinc function, defined as sinc(x) = sin(πx)/(πx), is particularly notable for its symmetry and behavior at...