Similarity and structured representation in human and nonhuman apes
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 1, 2025

Reverse Dissection and DiceCT Reveal Otherwise Hidden Data in the Evolution of the Primate Face
Published on: January 7, 2019
Carl J Hodgetts1, James O E Close2, Ulrike Hahn3
1Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX, UK; Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre, School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Maindy Road, Cardiff CF24 4HQ, UK.
Abstract:
How we judge the similarity between objects in the world is connected ultimately to how we represent those objects. It has been argued extensively that object representations in humans are 'structured' in nature, meaning that both individual features and the relations between them can influence similarity. In contrast, popular models within comparative psychology assume that nonhuman species appreciate only surface-level, featural similarities. By applying psychological models of structural and featural similarity (from conjunctive feature models to Tversky's Contrast Model) to visual similarity judgements from adult humans, chimpanzees, and gorillas, we demonstrate a cross-species sensitivity to complex structural information, particularly for stimuli that combine colour and shape. These results shed new light on the representational complexity of nonhuman apes, and the fundamental limits of featural coding in explaining object representation and similarity, which emerge strikingly across both human and nonhuman species.
Related Concept Videos
Synteny and Evolution
Around 80 million years ago, the human and mice lineages diverged from the common ancestor. During the course of evolution, the ancestral...
Convergent Evolution
The Representativeness Heuristic
Nonconscious Mimicry
Concepts and Prototypes
The brain organizes this information using concepts, which are mental categories grouping linguistic data,...
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

