Theory and Application of Neuropsychological Underpinnings of Adjudicative Competency

In their article, Aveson and colleagues postulate a model for understanding the neurocognitive underpinnings of competence to stand trial, and they present evidence to support that model for two specific facets: social intelligence and auditory verbal (episodic) memory. This commentary attempts to extend those findings by outlining specific interventions and assessment methods in the inpatient restoration setting that focus on strengthening these capacities and connecting them to the psycho legal context. It echoes the work of Aveson et al. that court is a transactional, social context heavily dependent on auditory processing and verbal comprehension and expression and suggests that restoration programs ought to incorporate interventions and assessment tools that address such faculties. Further refinement of our understanding of competence and its constituent components will enable us to better allocate scarce resources throughout the system, to tailor restoration programming to the needs of each individual defendant, and to aid defendants through restoration programming to develop the skills to take a more involved, collaborative role in the process.