Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments02:46

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments

38.4K
Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
38.4K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

74.1K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
74.1K
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors01:17

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

105
A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
105
Electronic Distance Measuring Instruments01:30

Electronic Distance Measuring Instruments

69
Electronic Distance Measuring Instruments (EDMs) are essential tools in modern surveying, offering precise distance measurements by emitting electromagnetic signals and calculating the time required for these signals to travel to a target and return. Two primary types of signals are used in EDMs — light waves and microwaves — each suited to specific environmental and distance requirements. Light-wave-based EDMs utilize either infrared or laser light, providing high accuracy over short...
69
Distance Corrections01:15

Distance Corrections

55
To achieve precise distance measurements, especially in surveying and construction, certain corrections must be applied to account for potential sources of error like the standardization errors, temperature variations, and slope adjustments.Standardization error emerges when measurement equipment undergoes changes, such as wear, repairs, or weather impacts. To address this, surveyors compare the equipment’s readings to a standard. This process identifies any deviation that might lead to...
55
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

610
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
610

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Optically smooth and optically rough surface in the view of optical 3D sensors based on imaging.

Applied optics·2022
Same author

Damage Analysis of Composite CFRP Tubes Using Acoustic Emission Monitoring and Pattern Recognition Approach.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)·2021
Same author

Coherence scanning interferometry with a focus-tunable lens.

Applied optics·2019
Same author

Shape from focus for large image fields.

Applied optics·2016
Same author

White-light interferometry on rough surfaces--measurement uncertainty caused by noise.

Applied optics·2012
Same author

Spatial coherence profilometry on tilted surfaces.

Applied optics·2009

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 31, 2025

Atomic Force Microscopy Cantilever-Based Nanoindentation: Mechanical Property Measurements at the Nanoscale in Air and Fluid
08:58

Atomic Force Microscopy Cantilever-Based Nanoindentation: Mechanical Property Measurements at the Nanoscale in Air and Fluid

Published on: December 2, 2022

3.1K

Measurement uncertainty of phase measuring deflectometry.

Pavel Pavliček, Eva Paličková

    Applied Optics
    |May 3, 2023
    PubMed
    Summary

    Phase measuring deflectometry (PMD) offers precise shape measurement for smooth surfaces. Theoretical limits show uncertainty depends on angular resolution, photon count, and light wavelength.

    Area of Science:

    • Optical Metrology
    • Surface Metrology
    • Precision Engineering

    Background:

    • Phase measuring deflectometry (PMD) is an established optical technique for object shape measurement.
    • It is particularly effective for surfaces with mirror-like optical smoothness.
    • The technique involves using the object as a mirror to observe a structured pattern.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To derive the theoretical limit of measurement uncertainty for Phase Measuring Deflectometry.
    • To analyze the factors contributing to measurement uncertainty.
    • To compare PMD's uncertainty with other deflectometry techniques.

    Main Methods:

    • Derivation of theoretical measurement uncertainty using the Cramér-Rao inequality.
    • Analysis of the uncertainty product, comprising angular uncertainty and lateral resolution.

    More Related Videos

    Addressing Practical Issues in Atomic Force Microscopy-Based Micro-Indentation on Human Articular Cartilage Explants
    08:06

    Addressing Practical Issues in Atomic Force Microscopy-Based Micro-Indentation on Human Articular Cartilage Explants

    Published on: October 28, 2022

    1.1K
    Quantitative Hardness Measurement by Instrumented AFM-indentation
    08:21

    Quantitative Hardness Measurement by Instrumented AFM-indentation

    Published on: November 22, 2016

    9.7K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jul 31, 2025

    Atomic Force Microscopy Cantilever-Based Nanoindentation: Mechanical Property Measurements at the Nanoscale in Air and Fluid
    08:58

    Atomic Force Microscopy Cantilever-Based Nanoindentation: Mechanical Property Measurements at the Nanoscale in Air and Fluid

    Published on: December 2, 2022

    3.1K
    Addressing Practical Issues in Atomic Force Microscopy-Based Micro-Indentation on Human Articular Cartilage Explants
    08:06

    Addressing Practical Issues in Atomic Force Microscopy-Based Micro-Indentation on Human Articular Cartilage Explants

    Published on: October 28, 2022

    1.1K
    Quantitative Hardness Measurement by Instrumented AFM-indentation
    08:21

    Quantitative Hardness Measurement by Instrumented AFM-indentation

    Published on: November 22, 2016

    9.7K
  • Investigation of the influence of light wavelength and photon detection on uncertainty.
  • Main Results:

    • Measurement uncertainty is fundamentally limited by an uncertainty product.
    • This product is directly influenced by angular uncertainty and lateral resolution.
    • The mean wavelength of light and the number of detected photons are critical factors affecting uncertainty magnitude.

    Conclusions:

    • The Cramér-Rao inequality provides a theoretical framework for PMD uncertainty.
    • Understanding these factors allows for optimization of measurement precision.
    • This study quantifies uncertainty limits, aiding in the development of advanced optical measurement systems.