Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same authorSame journal

Cultural Influences on Name Agreement: A Set of 237 Standardized Photographs of French Speakers in Quebec and France.

Journal of cognition·2026
Same author

The Relationship Between Dissociated Measures of Inhibition and Hypnotic and Placebo Analgesia Effects.

Biopsychosocial science and medicine·2025
Same author

Editorial for the special issue entitled: Mechanisms of control in selective attention tasks.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2025
Same author

Cognitive functioning in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome: Slowed information processing or a deficit in attentional selectivity?

Neuropsychology·2025
Same author

Mouse cursor trajectories capture the flexible adaptivity of predictive sentence processing.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2024
Same author

NewAbstractConcepts: A Database of 42 Normed Abstract Concepts and Exemplars.

Journal of cognition·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 31, 2025

Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients
07:42

Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients

Published on: December 16, 2022

3.0K

Do Task Sets Compete in the Stroop Task and Other Selective Attention Paradigms?

Benjamin A Parris1, Nabil Hasshim2, Ludovic Ferrand3

  • 1Department of Psychology, Bournemouth University, UK.

Journal of Cognition
|May 8, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Task set conflict may not be necessary to explain selective attention. Findings attributed to task set conflict might be explained by simpler stimulus-response associations and informational conflict alone.

Keywords:
Stroop taskinterferencephonological processingtask conflicttask sets

More Related Videos

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task
05:31

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task

Published on: February 26, 2020

14.8K
Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

8.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 31, 2025

Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients
07:42

Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients

Published on: December 16, 2022

3.0K
Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task
05:31

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task

Published on: February 26, 2020

14.8K
Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

8.9K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Task sets are crucial for cognitive control, involving switching between and managing competing tasks.
  • Stroop interference has been attributed to informational and task (set) conflict.
  • Task set control is debated, with some research questioning its necessity in explaining task switching costs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of task conflict in selective attention tasks.
  • To determine if stimulus-response (S-R) associations and informational conflict sufficiently explain phenomena attributed to task set conflict.
  • To critically evaluate existing evidence for task conflict and propose an alternative explanation.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on task conflict in selective attention.
  • Critical evaluation of findings supporting task conflict, including negative facilitation.
  • Development of an alternative account for negative facilitation based on informational conflict control.

Main Results:

  • Evidence suggests that task conflict may not be required to explain selective attention.
  • Negative facilitation might be explained by inadequate control over informational conflict.
  • The proposed alternative account was applied to paradigms like Colour-Object interference and Affordances tasks.

Conclusions:

  • Invoking competition between task sets may not be necessary in selective attention.
  • Simpler mechanisms like S-R associations and informational conflict may account for observed effects.
  • Further research is needed to fully elucidate the mechanisms underlying selective attention and task control.