Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

What did Eugen Bleuler really say?

M Menuck

    Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie
    |March 1, 1979
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Understanding Bleuler's 1911 schizophrenia concept requires historical context. Current diagnostic uncertainty stems from textual issues and misrepresentations of his work.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Increase in benzodiazepine abuse.

    Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie·1991
    Same author

    Criminality and childhood hyperactivity.

    Archives of general psychiatry·1991
    Same author

    The remitting atypical psychoses: clinical and nosologic considerations.

    Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie·1990
    Same author

    The nosologic status of the remitting atypical psychoses.

    Comprehensive psychiatry·1989
    Same author

    Ontario's road back to bedlam.

    Canadian Medical Association journal·1983
    Same author

    Involuntary admission to hospital and treatment in Ontario: is pessimism among physicians warranted?

    Canadian Medical Association journal·1982

    Area of Science:

    • Psychiatry
    • Psychology
    • Medical History

    Background:

    • Eugen Bleuler's 1911 monograph redefined dementia praecox, incorporating somatogenic and psychogenic theories.
    • Appreciating Bleuler's concept necessitates understanding its historical milieu.

    Discussion:

    • Current confusion surrounds Bleuler's schizophrenia concept due to textual complexities and inaccurate portrayals.
    • This ambiguity may contribute to contemporary diagnostic uncertainty in schizophrenia.

    Key Insights:

    • Bleuler's work is foundational but requires careful historical interpretation.
    • Misinterpretations of Bleuler's text have led to ongoing conceptual difficulties.

    Outlook:

    • Renewed interest in nosology and diagnostic rigor highlights the need for clarity on historical concepts.
  • Revisiting Bleuler's original work in context is crucial for advancing schizophrenia diagnosis.