Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Utility of Pancreatic Perivascular Adipose Tissue as a CT Imaging Biomarker for Diagnosing Type 2 Diabetes.

Diabetes·2026
Same author

Adopting a Trauma-Informed Framework in Clinical Practice.

Dental clinics of North America·2026
Same author

Dentoalveolar Fractures.

Dental clinics of North America·2026
Same author

Dental Implants in Rehabilitation of Patients with Facial Trauma: a Review of Most Current Practices.

Dental clinics of North America·2026
Same author

Occlusion Management in Facial Trauma: A Literature Review.

Dental clinics of North America·2026
Same author

The Expanding Role of Virtual Surgical Planning in Maxillofacial Trauma Management.

Dental clinics of North America·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 27, 2025

Experimental Model of Ligature-Induced Peri-Implantitis in Mice
05:37

Experimental Model of Ligature-Induced Peri-Implantitis in Mice

Published on: May 17, 2024

2.4K

Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence: A Web-Based Implant Failure and Peri-implantitis Prediction Model for

Peter Rekawek, Eliot A Herbst, Abhinav Suri

    The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants
    |June 6, 2023
    PubMed
    Summary

    Machine learning accurately predicts dental implant failure and peri-implantitis. Key factors include anesthetic amount, implant dimensions, antibiotics, hygiene, and diabetes, aiding in maximizing implant success.

    More Related Videos

    Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    04:09

    Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

    Published on: October 10, 2018

    8.3K
    Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization
    05:49

    Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization

    Published on: February 23, 2024

    898

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jul 27, 2025

    Experimental Model of Ligature-Induced Peri-Implantitis in Mice
    05:37

    Experimental Model of Ligature-Induced Peri-Implantitis in Mice

    Published on: May 17, 2024

    2.4K
    Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    04:09

    Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

    Published on: October 10, 2018

    8.3K
    Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization
    05:49

    Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization

    Published on: February 23, 2024

    898

    Area of Science:

    • Biomedical Engineering
    • Data Science in Dentistry
    • Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

    Background:

    • Dental implant success rates are high, but complications like failure and peri-implantitis can occur.
    • Predictive tools are needed to identify patients at risk and optimize treatment outcomes.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To develop and validate a machine learning (ML) model for predicting dental implant failure.
    • To develop and validate an ML model for predicting peri-implantitis.
    • To enhance overall dental implant success rates through predictive analytics.

    Main Methods:

    • Retrospective analysis of 942 dental implants from 398 patients (2006-2013).
    • Supervised learning models including logistic regression, random forest, support vector machines, and ensemble techniques were utilized.
    • Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic area under the curves (ROC AUC).

    Main Results:

    • The random forest model achieved the highest predictive accuracy.
    • ROC AUC for implant failure prediction was 0.872.
    • ROC AUC for peri-implantitis prediction was 0.840.
    • Top predictors for implant failure: local anesthetic amount, implant length/diameter, preoperative antibiotics, hygiene frequency.
    • Top predictors for peri-implantitis: implant length/diameter, preoperative antibiotics, hygiene frequency, diabetes mellitus.

    Conclusions:

    • Machine learning models can effectively predict dental implant failure and peri-implantitis.
    • Demographics, medical history, and surgical factors significantly influence implant outcomes.
    • The developed ML model can serve as a valuable clinical resource for improving dental implant treatment planning and success.