Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 26, 2025

Contrast Imaging in Mouse Embryos Using High-frequency Ultrasound
Published on: March 4, 2015
Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and High Sensitive Doppler for Monitoring Outcomes of Uterine Artery Embolization
Priscilla Machado1, Kathleen Gillmore2, Allison Tan1
1Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, 132 S 10th St, Main 763M, Philadelphia, PA 19107 (P.M., K.G., A.T., C.G., F.F.).
Rationale And Objectives:
To monitor fibroid microvascularity using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and a new high-sensitive Doppler mode (SMI) for assessment of uterine artery embolization (UAE) outcomes.
Materials And Methods:
Forty women with symptomatic uterine fibroids scheduled for UAE were enrolled in this Institutional Review Board-approved study. Subjects underwent three examinations (day 0, 15, and 90 post-UAE) with Color Doppler (CDI), power Doppler (PDI), color and monochrome SMI (cSMI and mSMI), and CEUS imaging of the fibroids. Clips were assessed by two radiologists classifying fibroids based on their vascularity. Fibroid fractional vascularity (FV; % of enhanced pixels within the fibroid) and flow intensity (as mean brightness level of the enhanced pixels) were quantified. Results were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA and nonparametric Wilcoxon sign rank tests. Inter-reader agreement was assessed with κ-values.
Results:
There was overall agreement between readers for all imaging modalities and examination times (P = .25; κ = 0.70). The FV analysis showed statistically significant differences between CEUS and the Doppler imaging modes (CDI, PDI, cSMI, and mSMI) for the three examination times were compared (P < .0001). The comparison using CDI, PDI, and cSMI showed no statistically significant difference (P = .53). The flow intensity analysis comparison between the Doppler imaging modes (CDI, PDI, cSMI and mSMI) and examination times showed statistically significant differences between all the Doppler imaging modalities (P = .02), except for the 90days post-UAE (P = .34). When the comparison was made for CDI, PDI, and cSMI there was no statistically significant differences (P < .47).
Conclusion:
CEUS and SMI can accurately evaluate fibroid microvascularity, and therefore, can be a noninvasive and accurate method for monitoring outcomes following UAE treatment.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System II:Types of Echocardiography
Types of Echocardiography
Transthoracic Echocardiography (TTE)
TTE is the most common type of echocardiogram which involves placing a transducer on the patient's chest, emitting sound waves to create heart images. TTE is invaluable for evaluating the heart's size, structure, and motion, making it particularly useful for...
Ultrasonography
During an ultrasonography procedure, a handheld device called...
Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Doppler Ultrasound Blood Pressure Assessment:
Preparation of Equipment:
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):

