Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

3.4K
The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
3.4K
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation01:20

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

1.8K
Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
1.8K
Naturalistic Observations02:30

Naturalistic Observations

15.5K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
15.5K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

148
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
148
Community Based Intervention01:30

Community Based Intervention

66
Community-based interventions in mental health represent a paradigm shift from institution-centered care to treatments embedded within the fabric of local communities. By prioritizing inclusion and leveraging existing societal structures, this approach fosters a supportive environment conducive to addressing mental health challenges while promoting individual dignity and agency.
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
66
Introduction to Epidemiology01:26

Introduction to Epidemiology

807
Epidemiology, known as the cornerstone of public health, involves studying the distribution and determinants of health-related events in defined populations and applying these insights to control health issues. This is essential for understanding how diseases spread, identifying populations at greater risk, and implementing measures to control or prevent outbreaks. Epidemiology addresses not only infectious diseases but also non-communicable conditions like cancer and cardiovascular disease,...
807

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparing Health Survey Data Cost and Quality Between Amazon's Mechanical Turk and Ipsos' KnowledgePanel: Observational Study.

Journal of medical Internet research·2024
Same author

Consequences of survey modification in a program evaluation: An exploratory research on evaluation study.

Evaluation and program planning·2023
Same author

The manifestations of politics in evaluation: An exploratory study across the evaluation process.

Evaluation and program planning·2021
Same author

The role of titles in enhancing data visualization.

Evaluation and program planning·2020
Same author

Incorporating public values into evaluative criteria: Using crowdsourcing to identify criteria and standards.

Evaluation and program planning·2018
Same author

The effects of stakeholder involvement on perceptions of an evaluation's credibility.

Evaluation and program planning·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 26, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.3K

Large-scale evaluation efforts and their implications for the field.

Tarek Azzam1

  • 1University of California, Santa Barbara, California, USA.

New Directions for Evaluation
|June 19, 2023
PubMed
Summary

The National Institutes of Health

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Research
  • Health Services Research
  • Program Evaluation

Background:

  • The Diversity Program Consortium's "Beginning to Underscore Inclusive Leadership and Discovery" (BUILD) initiative aimed to increase diversity in biomedical research.
  • Multisite evaluations present unique challenges in balancing site-specific needs with overarching program goals.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify field-wide implications from the multisite evaluation of BUILD initiative programs.
  • To review the work of authors contributing to this special issue, focusing on evaluation methodologies and outcomes.
  • To extract lessons learned from implementing and evaluating a large-scale, multisite diversity program.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a flexible evaluation orientation to accommodate diverse site needs.

More Related Videos

Measuring the Structure, Composition, and Change of Underwater Environments with Large-area Imaging
09:19

Measuring the Structure, Composition, and Change of Underwater Environments with Large-area Imaging

Published on: April 18, 2025

653
Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
03:14

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

632

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 26, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.3K
Measuring the Structure, Composition, and Change of Underwater Environments with Large-area Imaging
09:19

Measuring the Structure, Composition, and Change of Underwater Environments with Large-area Imaging

Published on: April 18, 2025

653
Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
03:14

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

632
  • Employed mixed-methods designs, emphasizing contextual understanding prior to measurement.
  • Applied innovative analytic techniques, including meta-analysis, to synthesize site-specific findings and assess cumulative impact.

    • Main Results:

    • Innovative approaches were necessary to manage the complexities of multisite evaluations.
    • Flexible, mixed-methods designs and advanced analytic techniques facilitated understanding of both individual site progress and overall initiative impact.
    • The evaluation yielded valuable insights into stakeholder engagement, program utilization, and adaptive management.

    Conclusions:

    • Multisite evaluations require adaptive and context-sensitive methodologies.
    • Successful program evaluation involves robust stakeholder engagement and a focus on practical application.
    • The BUILD initiative evaluation provides a model for assessing and improving diversity in biomedical research through rigorous, yet flexible, evaluation frameworks.