Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 25, 2025

07:22
Measuring the Motor Aspect of Cancer-Related Fatigue using a Handheld Dynamometer
Published on: February 20, 2020
5.9K
Designing criterion measures for physically demanding jobs
Deborah L Gebhardt1, Todd A Baker1
1Human Resources Research Organization, Alexandria, VA, USA.
Summary
Many US jobs require significant physical exertion, including lifting and climbing. This article reviews methods for assessing physical job demands and creating applicable evaluation criteria for diverse occupations.
Area of Science:
- Occupational health
- Physical ergonomics
- Workforce assessment
Background:
- The Bureau of Labor Statistics indicates 39.1% of the US civilian workforce engages in physically demanding jobs.
- These jobs involve activities like lifting, carrying, pushing/pulling, kneeling, stooping, crawling, and climbing in diverse environments.
- Similar physical demands are present in United States military occupations, including combat, rescue, and maintenance roles.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide an overview of criterion measures for assessing the physical domain of work.
- To discuss approaches for designing and evaluating these physical job criteria.
- To present a method for generating criterion measures applicable across multiple job types.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of existing criterion measures for physical job assessment.
- Analysis of approaches for criterion design and evaluation.
- Development of a framework for generating cross-job applicable physical criteria.
Main Results:
- Identification of various criterion measures used in physical domain assessment.
- Discussion of best practices for criterion development and validation.
- Proposal of a systematic method for creating adaptable physical job criteria.
Conclusions:
- Effective assessment of physical job demands is crucial for workforce health and safety.
- Standardized and adaptable criterion measures can improve the evaluation of physical job requirements.
- The proposed method offers a way to create relevant physical criteria across diverse occupations.
Related Concept Videos
Design Consideration
213
Designing a structure involves a series of considerations, primarily the material's ultimate strength, calculated through tests that measure changes under increased force until the material reaches its breaking point or limit. The ultimate load, where the material breaks, is divided by its original cross-sectional area, resulting in the ultimate normal stress or strength. The ultimate shearing stress is another significant factor taken into account.
The factor of safety is another key...
The factor of safety is another key...
213
Yield Criteria for Ductile Materials under Plane Stress
194
In designing structural elements and machine parts using ductile materials, it is crucial to ensure that these components withstand applied stresses without yielding. Yielding is initially determined through a tensile test, which evaluates the material's response to uniaxial stress. However, tensile stress is insufficient when components face biaxial or plane stress conditions This condition requires advanced criteria to predict failure.
The Maximum Shearing Stress Criterion, also known as...
The Maximum Shearing Stress Criterion, also known as...
194
Measures of Intelligence
7.7K
Psychologists measure intelligence by using standardized tests that produce a score known as the intelligence quotient or IQ. To understand IQ tests, it's important to recognize the key principles behind their construction: validity, reliability, and standardization.
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...
7.7K

