Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 24, 2025

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Coronary Reactivity Assessment Is Associated With Lower Health Care-Associated Costs in Patients Presenting With
Ali Ahmad1,2, Michel T Corban1,3, James P Moriarty4
1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (A.A., M.T.C., Y.K., R.G., C.S.R., A.P., J.D.S., L.O.L., A.L.).
Insights
Coronary reactivity testing (CRT) significantly reduced healthcare costs for patients with angina and nonobstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA). This diagnostic approach lowers overall expenses and healthcare utilization over two years.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Health Economics
Background:
- Chest pain diagnosis and treatment incur substantial healthcare costs.
- Angina and nonobstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA) is a common condition linked to adverse cardiovascular events, repeat testing, and hospitalizations.
- Coronary reactivity testing (CRT) can provide diagnostic certainty in ANOCA patients, but its financial impact is not well-studied.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the effect of coronary reactivity testing (CRT) on healthcare-related costs in patients diagnosed with angina and nonobstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA).
Main Methods:
- A retrospective observational study matched ANOCA patients who underwent CRT with those who had only diagnostic coronary angiography (CAG).
- Standardized, inflation-adjusted costs were collected and compared annually for two years post-index procedure.
- The study included 207 patients in the CRT group and 207 in the CAG group.
Main Results:
- The total healthcare cost was significantly higher in the CAG-only group ($37,804) compared to the CRT group ($13,679) over two years (P<0.001).
- Major cost differences were observed in imaging (including CAG), procedures (PCI, CABG, thrombectomy), and diagnostic tests (blood tests, EKG).
- Patients undergoing CRT demonstrated significantly reduced annual total costs and healthcare utilization.
Conclusions:
- Coronary reactivity testing (CRT) in ANOCA patients is associated with significantly lower annual total costs and reduced healthcare utilization.
- The findings support the potential integration of CRT into clinical practice for managing ANOCA patients.
- CRT may offer a cost-effective diagnostic strategy for patients presenting with chest pain and nonobstructive coronary artery disease.
Background:
The financial burden linked to the diagnosis and treatment of patients with chest pain on the health care system is considerable. Angina and nonobstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA) is common, associated with adverse cardiovascular events, and may lead to repeat testing or hospitalizations. Diagnostic certainty can be achieved in patients with ANOCA using coronary reactivity testing (CRT); however, its financial effect on the patient has not been studied. Our goal was to assess the effect of CRT on health care-related cost in patients with ANOCA.
Methods:
Patients with ANOCA who underwent diagnostic coronary angiography (CAG) and CRT (CRT group) were matched to controls who had similar presentation but only underwent a CAG without CRT (CAG group). Standardized inflation-adjusted costs were collected and compared between the 2 groups on an annual basis for 2 years post the index date (CRT or CAG).
Results:
Two hundred seven CRT and 207 CAG patients were included in the study with an average age of 52.3±11.5 years and 76% females. The total cost was significantly higher in the CAG group as compared with the CRT group ($37 804 [$26 933-$48 674] versus $13 679 [$9447-$17 910]; P<0.001). When costs are itemized and divided based on the Berenson-Eggers Type of Service categorization, the largest cost difference occurred in imaging (any type, including CAG; P<0.001), procedures (eg, percutaneous coronary intervention/coronary artery bypass grafting/thrombectomy) (P=0.001), and test (eg, blood tests, EKG; P<0.001).
Conclusions:
In this retrospective observational study, assessment of CRT in patients with ANOCA was associated with significantly reduced annual total costs and health care utilization. Therefore, the study may support the integration of CRT into clinical practice.
Related Concept Videos
Angina III: Clinical Manifestations and Assessment
Angina V: Nursing Management
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Angina IV: Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management

