Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Purposive Learning01:22

Purposive Learning

145
E. C. Tolman emphasized the purposiveness of behavior — the idea that much of our behavior is goal-directed. For instance, employees who aim for a promotion work diligently to meet their targets. Tolman argued that when classical conditioning and operant conditioning occur, the organism acquires certain expectations. In classical conditioning, a child might fear a dog because they expect it to bite. In operant conditioning, a person might consistently work overtime because they expect a...
145
Hierarchy of Motor Control01:18

Hierarchy of Motor Control

2.9K
The hierarchy of motor control refers to the different levels of organization and processing involved in controlling movement in the body. These levels range from higher cortical areas involved in planning and decision-making to lower spinal cord reflexes that respond automatically to external stimuli.
2.9K
Observational Learning01:12

Observational Learning

213
Albert Bandura's observational learning, also known as imitation or modeling, occurs when a person observes and imitates another's behavior. It is a quicker process than operant conditioning. A well-known example is the Bobo doll study, where children who saw an adult acting aggressively towards the doll were more likely to act aggressively when left alone, compared to those who observed a nonaggressive adult. Many psychologists view observational learning as a form of latent learning...
213
Incentive Theory: Pull Theory of Motivation01:18

Incentive Theory: Pull Theory of Motivation

485
Incentive theory, or the "pull theory" of motivation, suggests that external rewards primarily drive behavior. Individuals are motivated to engage in activities when they anticipate a desirable outcome. This is why people often work hard for promotions or study intensively to achieve high grades. These incentives can be tangible, physical rewards such as money or promotions, or intangible, non-physical rewards like praise and social recognition.
The theory differentiates between...
485
Law of Effect01:06

Law of Effect

1.4K
B.F. Skinner, a prominent figure in behavioral psychology, introduced operant conditioning by emphasizing the role of consequences in shaping behavior. This theory builds upon the law of effect proposed by Edward Thorndike, which posits that behaviors followed by satisfying outcomes are likely to be repeated. In contrast, those followed by unsatisfying outcomes are less likely to recur.
Edward Thorndike's foundational work involved studying learning in animals, particularly using puzzle...
1.4K
Reinforcement01:23

Reinforcement

280
Positive and negative reinforcement are key concepts in operant conditioning, a learning process where the consequences of a behavior affect the likelihood of that behavior being repeated.
Positive reinforcement occurs when a behavior is followed by the presentation of a rewarding stimulus, increasing the frequency of that behavior. For example:
280

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A systematic investigation reveals dissociable effects of ageing on implicit and explicit components of sensorimotor learning.

Nature human behaviour·2026
Same author

Minimal Impact of Low Vision on Explicit Sensorimotor Adaptation.

Neurorehabilitation and neural repair·2026
Same author

How to conduct behavioural experiments online.

Nature human behaviour·2026
Same author

Perceptual grouping can affect the online control of goal-directed hand movements.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same author

Cerebellar contributions to action and cognition: Prediction, timescale, and continuity.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Intercepting moving targets: does the visuomotor latency depend on whether one taps on the target or slides through it?

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Genetic Impacts on Variability of Body Fat Distribution Uncover Gene-Environment and Gene-Gene Interactions.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

16S ribosomal RNA modification drives transcript-specific translation efficiency.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

FlcE latches onto the FliL-stator complex to turbocharge flagellar motility in <i>Borrelia burgdorferi</i>.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Synaptic pruning, myelination and the emergence of psychiatric disorders in late adolescence.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Structural and functional insights into the Rcs phosphorelay.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

The structural basis of RanGAP1 regulation and catalysis in nuclear transport.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 24, 2025

Investigating Motor Skill Learning Processes with a Robotic Manipulandum
07:52

Investigating Motor Skill Learning Processes with a Robotic Manipulandum

Published on: February 12, 2017

8.8K

Implicit reward-based motor learning.

Nina M van Mastrigt1, Jonathan S Tsay2, Tianhe Wang2

  • 1Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Human Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Biorxiv : the Preprint Server for Biology
|July 10, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Binary feedback alone is sufficient for motor learning, inducing both explicit and implicit adjustments. This study shows simple success/failure cues can recalibrate sensorimotor maps.

More Related Videos

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
10:39

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

8.5K
Study Motor Skill Learning by Single-pellet Reaching Tasks in Mice
06:04

Study Motor Skill Learning by Single-pellet Reaching Tasks in Mice

Published on: March 4, 2014

21.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 24, 2025

Investigating Motor Skill Learning Processes with a Robotic Manipulandum
07:52

Investigating Motor Skill Learning Processes with a Robotic Manipulandum

Published on: February 12, 2017

8.8K
The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
10:39

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

8.5K
Study Motor Skill Learning by Single-pellet Reaching Tasks in Mice
06:04

Study Motor Skill Learning by Single-pellet Reaching Tasks in Mice

Published on: March 4, 2014

21.1K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Motor Control
  • Cognitive Psychology

Background:

  • Binary feedback (success/failure) drives motor learning and explicit strategy adjustments.
  • The capacity of binary feedback to induce implicit motor learning remains largely unexplored.

Approach:

  • Participants performed a center-out reaching task with gradually rotated, invisible reward zones (7.5° or 25°).
  • Binary feedback indicated movement success within the reward zone.
  • Implicit learning was assessed via aftereffects in a no-feedback phase and generalization to flanking targets.

Key Points:

  • Participants adapted reach angles significantly, demonstrating effective learning under binary feedback.
  • A small but robust aftereffect (2-3°) was observed, confirming binary feedback elicits implicit learning.
  • Generalization patterns contradicted use-dependent learning, suggesting sensorimotor recalibration.

Conclusions:

  • Binary feedback is sufficient to induce implicit motor learning.
  • The findings challenge use-dependent learning models and support sensorimotor map recalibration.
  • This has implications for understanding learning mechanisms and designing effective feedback interventions.