Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

6.5K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.5K
Self-Discrepancy Theory02:45

Self-Discrepancy Theory

18.4K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.  
18.4K
Deindividuation00:57

Deindividuation

26.4K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
26.4K
Theories of Dissolution: Diffusion Layer Model01:15

Theories of Dissolution: Diffusion Layer Model

816
Dissolution, the process by which drug particles dissolve in a solvent, is explained by the diffusion layer model, a theoretical framework that simulates the absorption of oral drugs and allows us to analyze experimental data.
This process starts with a thin layer, saturated with the drug, forming at the interface between the solid and liquid. The solute then diffuses from this layer into the main solution. The Noyes-Whitney equation suggests that the rate of dissolution relies on the diffusion...
816
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

3.4K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
3.4K
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition01:24

Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition

63
A revisionist approach to Jean Piaget's theory of cognitive development has brought new insights that challenge and reinterpret his established ideas. Piaget proposed that the formal operational stage, emerging in adolescence, represents the culmination of cognitive maturity. During this stage, individuals are said to develop abstract thinking, engage in systematic problem-solving, and show a form of egocentrism, believing others are as preoccupied with their behavior as they are...
63

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessing the role of attentional inhibition and cognitive flexibility in convergent and divergent thinking during creative task performance.

BMC psychology·2026
Same author

Examining the Impact of Brief Mindfulness Practice on Sustained Attention, Attentional Inhibition and Convergent Thinking.

Journal of Intelligence·2025
Same author

Metareasoning: Theoretical and Methodological Developments.

Journal of Intelligence·2025
Same author

A replication and development of the Short Cognitive Mediation Beliefs Questionnaire (CMBQ-S).

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)·2024
Same author

Grounding Cognition in Perceptual Experience.

Journal of Intelligence·2024
Same author

Changing-state irrelevant speech disrupts visual-verbal but not visual-spatial serial recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2024
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 23, 2025

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

5.4K

Explaining normative-deliberative gaps is essential to dual-process theorizing.

Edward J N Stupple1, Linden J Ball2

  • 1School of Psychology, College of Health, Psychology and Social Care, University of Derby, Derby, UK e.j.n.stupple@derby.ac.uk; https://www.derby.ac.uk/staff/ed-stupple/.

The Behavioral and Brain Sciences
|July 18, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Challenges in understanding reasoning processes are discussed. Methodological issues in inferring deliberation from responses are highlighted, suggesting a new dual-process model.

More Related Videos

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Self-distancing in Young Children
07:01

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Self-distancing in Young Children

Published on: March 1, 2019

8.0K
Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 23, 2025

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

5.4K
Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Self-distancing in Young Children
07:01

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Self-distancing in Young Children

Published on: March 1, 2019

8.0K
Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.1K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychology
  • Philosophy of Mind

Background:

  • Assumptions of exclusivity in cognitive processes are common.
  • Inferring deliberative processes from reasoning responses presents significant challenges.
  • Existing models may oversimplify the relationship between normative standards and actual reasoning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and discuss challenges to assumptions of exclusivity in cognitive processes.
  • To highlight methodological and conceptual pitfalls in inferring deliberation from reasoning.
  • To propose a framework for understanding normative-deliberative gaps.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of existing theories on reasoning and deliberation.
  • Examination of potential causes for discrepancies between normative standards and reasoning outcomes.
  • Review of methodological approaches in cognitive research.

Main Results:

  • Significant challenges exist in assuming cognitive exclusivity.
  • Methodological and conceptual pitfalls hinder accurate inference of deliberative processes.
  • Normative-deliberative gaps arise from various factors including disputed standards, interpretation differences, and cognitive dispositions.

Conclusions:

  • A soft normativist approach is recommended for future research.
  • Developing the dual-process 2.0 architecture requires addressing these identified challenges.
  • A more nuanced understanding of reasoning and deliberation is necessary.