Explaining normative-deliberative gaps is essential to dual-process theorizing
Edward J N Stupple1, Linden J Ball2
1School of Psychology, College of Health, Psychology and Social Care, University of Derby, Derby, UK e.j.n.stupple@derby.ac.uk; https://www.derby.ac.uk/staff/ed-stupple/.
Abstract:
We discuss significant challenges to assumptions of exclusivity and highlight methodological and conceptual pitfalls in inferring deliberative processes from reasoning responses. Causes of normative-deliberative gaps are considered (e.g., disputed or misunderstood normative standards, strategy preferences, task interpretations, cognitive ability, mindware and thinking dispositions) and a soft normativist approach is recommended for developing the dual-process 2.0 architecture.
Related Concept Videos
Reason and Intuition
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Deindividuation
Theories of Dissolution: Diffusion Layer Model
This process starts with a thin layer, saturated with the drug, forming at the interface between the solid and liquid. The solute then diffuses from this layer into the main solution. The Noyes-Whitney equation suggests that the rate of dissolution relies on the diffusion...
Hindsight Biases
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition


