Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 23, 2025

06:52
An Inertial Measurement Unit Based Method to Estimate Hip and Knee Joint Kinematics in Team Sport Athletes on the Field
Published on: May 26, 2020
8.0K
An Examination of the Challenge/Threat State and Sport-Performance Relationship While Controlling for Past
Matthew Jewiss1,2, Oliver R Runswick3, Iain Greenlees2
1School of Psychology and Sport Science, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge,United Kingdom.
Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology
|July 18, 2023
Summary
Challenge and threat states may not predict performance under pressure. Controlling for past performance in cricketers and golfers revealed that previous experience, not psychological state, was the key factor in performance outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Sports Science
- Performance Psychology
Background:
- Challenge and threat states are theorized to influence performance across various domains.
- Previous research often fails to adequately control for between-subjects variability in past performance.
- Understanding the precise impact of these states requires rigorous control of confounding variables.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the effect of challenge and threat states on performance.
- To examine the role of past performance as a predictor of performance under pressure.
- To compare the influence of challenge and threat states using different control methods for past performance.
Main Methods:
- Experiment 1: Utilized previous performance statistics in a between-subjects design with 45 amateur cricketers.
- Experiment 2: Employed a within-subject design with 40 noncompetitive golfers to assess performance.
- Cardiovascular correlates of challenge and threat states were measured in conjunction with performance metrics.
Main Results:
- In Experiment 1, regression analysis indicated that cardiovascular markers of challenge and threat states predicted cricket batting performance.
- In Experiment 2, both between- and within-subject analyses identified past performance as the sole significant predictor of golf putting performance.
- The predictive power of challenge and threat states varied depending on the experimental design and control measures.
Conclusions:
- The findings suggest that the influence of challenge and threat states on performance may be overstated when past performance is not adequately controlled.
- Past performance emerges as a critical determinant of performance under pressure, potentially overshadowing the effects of psychological states.
- Future research should prioritize robust control for prior experience when examining the impact of psychological states on performance.
Related Concept Videos
Social Facilitation
32.0K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
32.0K
Regression Toward the Mean
6.3K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.3K
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
39.1K
People can go to great lengths to protect their self-image and present themselves in ways that they want others to see them. Sociologist Erving Goffman presented the idea that a person is like an actor on a stage. Calling his theory dramaturgy, Goffman believed that we use “impression management” to present ourselves to others as we hope to be perceived. Each situation is a new scene, and individuals perform different roles depending on who is present (Goffman, 1959). Think about...
39.1K

