Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Vocal restorative surgery: why wait?

M D Trudeau, S M Hirsch, D E Schuller

    The Laryngoscope
    |September 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Vocal restorative surgery after laryngectomy is effective for speech rehabilitation. Primary surgical placement of tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) resulted in better speech outcomes compared to secondary TEF placement.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal cancer: phase III randomized Intergroup study 0099.

    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2023
    Same author

    Type II diabetes and oral health: perceptions among adults with diabetes and oral/health care providers in Ghana.

    Community dental health·2014
    Same author

    Drawings of the opposite sex: Continued use of the draw a person test and young state hospital patients.

    Journal of youth and adolescence·2014
    Same author

    Clinicopathological determinants of positron emission tomography computed tomography fluorodeoxyglucose standardised uptake value in head and neck carcinoma.

    The Journal of laryngology and otology·2013
    Same author

    DNA copy number gains in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

    Oncogene·2005
    Same author

    Differential targets of CpG island hypermethylation in primary and metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

    Journal of medical genetics·2003
    Same journal

    Discrimination of Pairs of Chemosensory Stimuli in Relation to Respiration.

    The Laryngoscope·2026
    Same journal

    What Safety Precautions Are Recommended When Lasering in the Airway?

    The Laryngoscope·2026
    Same journal

    Success of Anterior Ethmoidal Artery Flaps for Nasal Septal Perforation Repair: A Systematic Review.

    The Laryngoscope·2026
    Same journal

    Laryngeal IgG4-Related Disease: A Systematic Review of Clinical Features and Management.

    The Laryngoscope·2026
    Same journal

    Elevated BMI Is Not Associated With Adverse Outcomes in Open Airway Reconstruction.

    The Laryngoscope·2026
    Same journal

    What is the Most Effective Treatment Approach for Vocal Fold Granuloma?

    The Laryngoscope·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Otolaryngology
    • Speech Pathology
    • Surgical Oncology

    Background:

    • Laryngectomy, the surgical removal of the larynx, often necessitates vocal rehabilitation.
    • Tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) surgery is a common method for voice restoration post-laryngectomy.
    • Comparing primary (at time of laryngectomy) versus secondary (after laryngectomy) TEF placement is crucial for understanding rehabilitation success.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the effectiveness of vocal restorative surgery in laryngectomees.
    • To compare speech outcomes and complication rates between primary and secondary TEF placement.
    • To assess the impact of TEF surgery on the overall recovery and rehabilitation process.

    Main Methods:

    • Retrospective review of 36 laryngectomees who underwent vocal restorative surgery.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Categorization of patients into primary (21) and secondary (15) TEF groups.
  • Analysis of current speech mode and complications related to recovery and rehabilitation.

    • Main Results:

    • Fewer patients in the primary TEF group used a surgically restored voice (approx. 10% less).
    • No surviving patients in the primary TEF group remained aphonic.
    • 27% of surviving patients in the secondary TEF group failed to achieve verbal communication.
    • Vocal restorative surgery at the time of laryngectomy showed a low complication rate.

    Conclusions:

    • Primary TEF placement appears more successful in achieving verbal communication post-laryngectomy.
    • Vocal restorative surgery, particularly when performed primarily, effectively initiates rehabilitation without compromising oncological outcomes.
    • Early intervention with TEF surgery is recommended for improved speech recovery in laryngectomees.